Potential dispersion of the radioactive cloud
over The Northern Hemisphere This
animation displays a potential dispersion of the radioactive
cloud (Caesium 137 Isotope) after a nuclear accident in reactor
Fukushima I. The continuous release rate is very uncertain,
thus the calculations have to be interpreted qualitatively.
Dispersion in the near surface level (Level 1), in appr. 2500
m height (Level 12) and in appr. 5000
m height (Level 16).
FIG.
6: COMPARISON OF CHERNOBYL AND FUKUSHIMA RADIATION PLUME: The
global fission product contamination plume aerial distribution
from Chernobyl (left) compared to the Fukushima radiation plume
and contamination levels (right) in North America. Nuclear explosions
and accidents that occur on the ground and are picked up by
air currents in the troposphere, result in much higher rainout
of the nuclear materials into the environment, a much more efficient
form of nuclear war, and conveniently everyone thinks it’s
an accident. Compared to bomb testing, which resulted in environmental
deposition of only 15% of the radiation created by bomb tests
in a period of 65 years, with Chernobyl, depleted uranium, and
Fukushima, 95% of the radiation and aerosols will be rained
out of the troposphere in 2 ½ months. Even more alarming
is that the comparison of peak Japanese radiation releases from
Fukushima, were at least 300 times higher than from Chernobyl,
as estimated by Dr. Chris Busby, a British radiation expert.
The fact that the US military is synchronizing the peak bombing
campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan with the summer monsoon rainy
season since 2003, indicates that depleted uranium is being
used as a military depopulation agent in the Middle East, Africa,
SE Asia, Central Asia, Asia, and beyond.
Source (left): Vostok
Project, http://vostokproject.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/ultimos-modernos-volumenes-bajo-la-luz-a-las-sombras-de-chernobyl/
Source (right): Institut de Radioprotection et de sureté
nucléaire (ICRN), “Simulations
of the atmospheric dispersion of the radioactive plume formed
by the ejecta from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant
since [March] 12”, March 19, 2011. http://www.irsn.fr/FR/Actualites_presse/Actualites/Pages/20110319_simulation_dispersion_panache_radioactif.aspx Transcript
illustration by Leuren Moret in "Fukushima
Radiation and Uranium Weapon Update;"
Dr. James Fetzer interview with Leuren Moret (1st and
2nd hour) and Dr. Chris Busby (2nd hr), 28 Oct 2011.
Japan
earthquakes 2011 Visualization map,
uploaded by StoryMonoroch on Jan 2, 2012 [Ed. Note: This graphically
shows the amazing spike above normal levels of earthquake activity
on March 11th, and how above normal levels have persisted for
months].
FIG.
22: PROFESSOR YUKIO HAYAKAWA: RADIATION CONTAMINATION ROUTE
MAP This map is the careful work of Professor Yukio Hayakawa
from Gunma University in Japan, indicating the contours, routes,
and timing of dispersion of radioactive contamination from the
March 11, 2011, Fukushima nuclear disaster. Within 10 days of
the Fukushima earthquake and tsunami on March 11, 2011, a large
area of Japan was already contaminated with high levels of fission
products not reported to the public. By March 15, contamination
(dark yellow) had reached the mountainous Nagano region of western
Japan, and to the south west (dark orange). By March 20 contamination
(dark blue) had moved to the northeast of Fukushima. By March
21 contamination (bright pink) reached south through Chiba into
Tokyo. Another plume (turquoise) moved northeast offshore before
contaminating the Sendai region. Within 10 days of the Fukushima
disaster on March 11, a
large part of Japan was already contaminated with high levels
of fission products, not reported to the public. Source:
Prof. Yukio Hayakawa, Gunma University, Japan. Illustration
used in the
3 Feb 2012 article"Fallujah,
Fukushima, and the Global Radiation Catastrophe"
Dr. James Fetzer interviews Leuren Moret and Dr. Chris Busby
on The
Real Deal talks show.
Also posted at Veterans Today under the same title,
divided into Part
I and Part
II. Transcripts
prepared by William B. Fox, who also helped to organize this
interview.
Norwegian
Institute for Air Research (NILU) forecast
From Xenon-133
and caesium-137 releases into the atmosphere from the Fukushima
Dai-ichi nuclear power plant: determination of the source term,
tmospheric dispersion, and deposition (PDF), by
A. Stohl (1), P. Seibert (2), G. Wotawa (3), D. Arnold (2,4),
J. F. Burkhart (1), S. Eckhardt (1), C. Tapia (5), A. Vargas
(4), and T. J. Yasunari (6), published 1 March, 2012, page 2336,
with the following institutions: (1) NILU – Norwegian
Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway; (2) Institute of
Meteorology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences,
Vienna, Austria; (3) Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics,
Vienna, Austria; (4) Institute of Energy Technologies (INTE),
Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), Barcelona, Spain; (5)
Department of Physics and Nucelar Engineering (FEN), Technical
University of Catalonia (UPC), Barcelona, Spain; (6) Universities
Space Research Association, Goddard Earth Sciences and Technology
and Research, Columbia, MD 21044, USA
Neptunium
239 dispersion, Japan DataPoke.org.
DataPoke FLEXPART model data and pFlexpart dispersion
plots developed with Tepco(2011)[19] total release
evalutation. This data includes dispersion models
of Plutonium-239 and Neptunium-239.
Plutonium 239
Dispersion, Japan
Plutonium
239 dispersion, Japan DataPoke.org.
DataPoke FLEXPART model data and pFlexpart dispersion
plots developed with Tepco(2011)[19] total release
evalutation. This data includes dispersion models
of Plutonium-239 and Neptunium-239.
From 2RadNet
or SadNet? The EPA’s Failed Radiation Detection System
"...The graph shows that this monitoring station was one
of the units actually running on 3/11 . The readings were
significantly higher prior to 3/11 and drop to a much
lower level afterwards. This is an indication that the units
were running in an uncalibrated condition and
were adjusted only after the events at Fukushima."
Norwegian
Institute for Air Research (NILU) forecast
Neptunium 239
Dispersion, North America
Neptunium
239 dispersion, North America, DataPoke.org.
DataPoke FLEXPART model data and pFlexpart dispersion
plots developed with Tepco(2011)[19] total release
evalutation. This data includes dispersion models
of Plutonium-239 and Neptunium-239.
Plutonium 239
Dispersion, North America
Plutonium
239 dispersion, North America, DataPoke.org.
DataPoke FLEXPART model data and pFlexpart dispersion
plots developed with Tepco(2011)[19] total release
evalutation. This data includes dispersion models
of Plutonium-239 and Neptunium-239.
2011-03-11
[foreshadowing events] Japan’s
Deadly Game of Nuclear Rouletteby Leuren Moret,
Special to The Japan Times, Sunday, May 23, 2004; March
28, 2011 note by Leuren Moret: "This
was written in 2004, I personally organized against nuclear
power plants 30 yrs ago and nothing has changed. It’s
still a very dangerous, extremely expensive form of energy where
the risks are too high for the benefits gained. There is no
way of disposing with the waste and as we see in Japan there
are no back-up contingency’s when something goes wrong,
in addition it’s insane to build these plants on major
fault lines. The mass media would have us believe this is safe,
when they manipulate data and downplay the problems of this
deadly nuclear legacy we’re leaving for generations to
come." Of
all the places in all the world where no one in their right
mind would build scores of nuclear power plants, Japan would
be pretty near the top of the list. The
Japanese archipelago is located on the so-called Pacific Rim
of Fire, a large active volcanic and tectonic zone ringing North
and South America, Asia and island arcs in Southeast Asia. The
major earthquakes and active volcanoes occurring there are caused
by the westward movement of the Pacific tectonic plate and other
plates leading to subduction under Asia. Japan
sits on top of four tectonic plates, at the edge of the subduction
zone, and is in one of the most tectonically active regions
of the world. It was extreme pressures and temperatures, resulting
from the violent plate movements beneath the seafloor, that
created the beautiful islands and volcanoes of Japan. Nonetheless,
like many countries around the world -- where General Electric
and Westinghouse designs are used in 85 percent of all commercial
reactors -- Japan has turned to nuclear power as a major energy
source. In fact the three top nuclear-energy countries are the
United States, where the existence of 118 reactors was acknowledged
by the Department of Energy in 2000, France with 72 and Japan,
where 52 active reactors were cited in a December 2003 Cabinet
White Paper. The
52 reactors in Japan -- which generate a little over 30 percent
of its electricity -- are located in an area the size of California,
many within 150 km of each other and almost all built along
the coast where seawater is available to cool them. However,
many of those reactors have been negligently sited on active
faults, particularly in the subduction zone along the Pacific
coast, where major earthquakes of magnitude 7-8 or more on the
Richter scale occur frequently. The periodicity of major earthquakes
in Japan is less than 10 years. There is almost no geologic
setting in the world more dangerous for nuclear power than Japan
-- the third-ranked country in the world for nuclear reactors. "I
think the situation right now is very scary," says Katsuhiko
Ishibashi, a seismologist and professor at Kobe University.
"It's like a kamikaze terrorist wrapped in bombs just waiting
to explode." [more
here]
2011-03-11 [HAARP events which set the stage for this catastrophic
date] Fukushima
Tectonic Nuclear Warfare Monitored by World HAARP partners,
Alfred Webre interview with Leuren Moret,dated
21 May 2011
Leuren Moret: ...on May 18th, an article
was posted in The Technology Review which is published
by M.I.T. in Boston, one of the two big military contractors
for weapons for the Pentagon and U.S. Government, and it was
titled "Atmosphere
Above Japan Heated Rapidly Before the Magnitude 9 Earthquake"
which was at Fukushima. What this scientist said is infrared
emissions above the epicenter of the -- it is actually called
the Tohoku earthquake which damaged Fukushima and northern
Japan -- it increased dramatically in the days before the
devastating earthquake in Japan. He posted a series of very,
very interesting maps of Japan, where you could see the plate
boundaries, the tectonic plate boundaries, there are four
of them around Japan, or under Japan, and on March 5th you
could see that there were heating spots in the north of Japan
and in Kyushu,
the south of Japan, which is on the Asian plate, subducting
under Japan. Japan is just kind of floating or teetering above
on the edge of that. There was also a spot near Hamaoka,
which is south, southeast of Tokyo, I guess southwest of Tokyo,
and so on the Philippine side of that plate boundary just
offshore they were heating there too. These are fairly round,
fairly circular heating spots. That would be characteristic
of HAARP. On March 6th and 7th there was no activity, but
on March 8th there was heavy, I would call it burning, or
major heating, and it actually triggered a 7.2 Richter scale
earth quake up in the north end of Honshu,
which is the main island of Japan where Fukushima is also
located. So on the 9th, there was further heating where that
earthquake occurred, and there was much heavier heating on
sort of the Tokyo area, the Kanto
area of Japan, kind of in the middle of the big Island of
Honshu. On the 10th there was very, very intense heating up
above northeast of Fukushima, in the area where that earthquake
had occurred, the 7.2 earthquake, and there was also more
down on the southern end of Tokyo next to the Philippine plate
boundary. Now on the 11th, the day that the earthquake occurred,
there was very heavy burning offshore from Fukushima, some
slightly in the sort of Chiba area offshore. And of course
that is the day the earthquake happened. Now what is interesting
is there was more heating, more than any other time, on the
12th. This time it was at the junction of the Philippine plate,
the Asian plate, and the North American plate, which covers
the Pacific. That is very, very interesting because three
of those burn spots were in a straight line, which was from
northwest to southeast. So this is really, really, interesting.
The magnetometer readings at Gakona,
Alaska actually correlate with these activities that were
measured with the infrared light over the islands of Japan,
the archipelago, and those measurements would have been made
probably by five geosynchronous
Los Alamos satellites that were used to observe the Kashmir
earthquake, I believe it was in 2005. These magnetometer
readings are very, very interesting, and they certainly correlate
with that data. What they show, which was also observed by
the Japanese magnetometer readings, is a frequency of 2.5
hertz for
a couple of days before that earthquake. That is the frequency
actually that triggers earthquakes with this HAARP technology.
So I think that we are collecting much more information and
understanding how HAARP works, and also finding the forensic
evidence on their own sites to prove that what we are saying
is correct. Alfred Webre: Right. Now there have been
various accounts, and people have been asking and saying that
there were events in the sun which correlate with the various
dates of the earthquake, or events in other astronomical entities
like the galactic
black hole. I just want to go through and test for the
fact that it appears as though the data shows that it was
HAARP and not these solar events of these other galactic,
astronomical events that caused the Fukushima earthquake event.
Moret: Well the tectonic warfare is actually
designed to release huge amounts of energy that are part of
natural events. So in an earthquake zone, and the major earthquake
zones are at the tectonic plate boundaries around the world
where the continents, these tectonic plates sort of meet,
or they are marginal to each other, those fault lines, and
they are actually collision zones, have tremendous amounts
of stresses that build up and they build up and build up.
That is called the elastic limit. And when they reach a certain
point where they have enough energy stored up to suddenly
release it, that is called reaching the elastic limit. That
would be like pulling a rubber band and pulling a rubber band
tighter and tighter until it breaks. So what would trigger
these excessive amounts of energy in a fault zone? Well something
just as simple as a high tide which adds a tremendous amount
of burden or an overload, a load on a fault zone. Actually
high tides very frequently trigger earthquakes. This HAARP
tectonic warfare technology is designed to be used in
fault zones areas where the faults are overdue for an earthquake
and where huge stresses have been stored up and accumulated.
And that is how they triggered the Sumatra earthquake which
threw the whole island of Sumatra 14 feet to a new position.
Just the Fukushima earthquake, this is for a 9.0 earthquake,
I had Marion
Fulk who is one of the last Manhattan Project scientists
who solved all the problems on the hydrogen bomb and made
it work for the U.S., I asked him to calculate what the nuclear
bomb equivalent energy was released from the Fukushima or
Tohoku earthquake on March 11th. He calculated it and said
it is one million 30 kiloton nuclear bombs the size of Hiroshima
and Nagasaki. So this is releasing much, much more of a shock
wave, a destructive shock wave than a nuclear weapon can release.
It is great, because no one thinks, they think it is just
a natural event, an unfortunate earthquake and tsunami. They
just pick themselves up and go on to clean up the disaster
and to rebuild their communities, their lives and their country.
But in the case of Fukushima and some of these other earthquakes
that we know are triggered by HAARP, it is not a natural event,
it is an artificially triggered natural event, which is a
natural event that has been weaponized for the benefit of
whoever is triggering it. Now the way that they are pumping
extra energy into that fault
line to destabilize it, as we know from the magnetometer
readings, and from the atmospheric irregularities reported
for a week over that fault area, and also geologists around
the world are noticing that also happened in Haiti before
the Haiti earthquake. It has happened in other earthquakes,
which is not normal. It was not observed in the past. And
so the way that they are doing it, is to pump very intense,
very focused energy in radio waves. These are ELF or Extra
Low Frequency waves into a fault zone. And that increases
the heat and the stress, and finally after about five days
of these daily pulsing into the fault zone they can trigger
an earthquake. Now when a sun spot event happens, that energy
that is released is not just diffused over the planet earth,
it is also diffused throughout the solar system and also the
universe. It is not focused. It is not pulsed. It is just
a random event which has always happened. So it would not
really be suitable for triggering earthquakes. Now what also
goes along with this, is that it is the Department of Energy
and Intelligence assets [Editor's Note: eg. Mossad-CIA-MI6]
who are putting the sunspot theory out as the reason for these
earthquakes. They are the ones behind the weapons of mass
destruction. They are deciding how to use it and how to benefit
from it. So I just do not think that is a credible theory.
You have to ask scientists, not politicians and intelligence
agents and bankers who are really gangsters. Webre: Right, now there was an international
HAARP experiment from March 2nd to 9th at Tromso, Norway.
Is that sort of like the drill exercise that they had on 9/11,
on the day of September 11, 2001, where they were simulating
the hijacking of airliners? Moret: Well, I think so. They may have even
participated in it. It could have been a practice for them,
you know, monitoring what the U.S. was doing. Certainly the
signal was transmitted from Gakona. But it could have come
from other transmitters as well. This was called the International
Experiment on the Research of Ionosphere Heating Phenomena
initiated initiated by powerful HF radio waves provided by
EISCAT at Tromso, Norway. EISCAT is that international organization
or coalition of Britain, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Japan, China,
Finland, and Russia was there too...
Leuren Moret: ...On March 9th, there was
a foreshadowing event of this Fukushima disaster, and that
was that the Center for Disease Control in the United States
suddenly posted a lot of documents on radiation and continued
to for the next 30 days. Hundreds of documents. Webre: And this is just to remind people,
this is suddenly out of nowhere two days prior to the March
11, 2011 Fukushima event. Moret: Yes Webre: And that foreshadowing is part of
the technology of a false flag operation so that it shows
that it was a command and control element within the false
flag operation that triggered the CDC to do this, and that
coordinated the Stuxnet virus and the HAARP, possibly the
Tromso, Norway HAARP facility on March 11, 2011. This is just
so that people get an idea of the integrated, genocidal, planetary
genocidal aspects of this program. Moret: It has never happened before. I think
we have been very lucky because of the Internet to be able
to get so much information and to connect it. And I do not
think that there are many people putting this information
out. So the audience should not be alarmed by it. It is meant
to empower you, not to frighten you. We are doing it because
it is happening to everyone and everyone needs to know. So
the radiation syndicated pages that the Centers for Disease
Control posted have titles like Radiation Emergencies; Radiation
Emergencies: Protecting Yourself and Your Family. Hold on
just a minute. [Pause]. Radiation, Ask Questions, FAQs about
a radiation emergency. Radiation emergencies information for
clinicians. Radiation Institute. And so it goes on with many,
many, many of these documents that were suddenly posted two
days before the disaster. Now on March 17th, which is the
day before the radiation from the first Fukushima explosion
reached the West Coast of the United States, public health
officials in counties around California, and it must have
been for every state, issued letters to doctors, ordering
them not to give iodine tablets or iodine supplements to their
patients who were concerned about radiation poisoning. How
could a doctor in his right mind prevent his patients from
protecting themselves and their families from damage to their
thyroid glands. That is a central messenger system in the
body that controls and sends messenger molecules to all parts
of the body to control functioning. And damage to the thyroid
is a main causes of this huge epidemic of obesity that we
have in the United States. And I just keep saying over and
over again they want to blame it on us, our lifestyles, our
genetics, blah, blah blah, but if it is an epidemic, it is
not genetic. It is impossible. So these public health officials
in every county issued these letters. I have copies of two
from different counties in California. On March 17th and 18th
there were very, very heavy chemtrails being sprayed all over
the San Francisco Bay area, and it has been reported that
they were widely sprayed over the West Coast as well. Even
parts of Arizona. On March 18th they were still spraying chemtrails.
This was a Friday morning in San Francisco. And this huge
vortex appeared in the sky over San Francisco. At 11:00 AM
there was suddenly lightening and thunder and the electricity
flickered. And at 11:05 AM suddenly tornado alerts came out
on the television, and a two week downpour started. We should
not have been having two weeks of rain at this time of year.
We have no rain from April or May until November, because
we have a Mediterranean climate in California. That downpour
started. We get fourteen inches of rain on average every year
in California. We were getting an inch an hour for hour after
hour on many days. It caused flooding of 19 counties in California.
The governor announced a state emergency because of all the
flooding, but he never mentioned all the radiation. This is
more weather engineering to carry out a more efficient nuclear
war. And there is no more efficient nuclear war than that
delivered by bombs or radiation that are exploded in rain
clouds, and then that is rained out. We got a huge dose on
the West Coast, and that is why the car floor mats and the
building where that volunteer radiation monitoring station
is, has been reporting such high levels, and they are increasing
every day.
Leuren
Moret: Now one characteristic of a HAARP event is
foreshadowing. Foreshadowing is either a creation of the act
itself, which happens later on, some time later, or aspects
of it are introduced or used as drills, or whatever. There
were three very outstanding foreshadowing events which I believe
are part of the Fukushima disaster being set up. And one was
the impact of the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant on
India, on the death of 25 million Indian babies during the
period that very large amounts of radiation were being dumped
into the Irish Sea. And as a scientist on that project stated
to the environmental committee in the Parliament, he said
that Sellafield is the biggest nuclear polluter in the world.
And so I began to wonder why the British would be dumping
such huge amounts of radiation into the Irish Sea which has
now migrated throughout Scandinavia and contaminated their
fisheries, and has gone into the Arctic. But what was more
shocking than anything was the discovery through an Indian
scientist that that Sellafield radiation had migrated south
into the Great Conveyor Belt which is the huge circulation
system that loops around the Atlantic up into the Pacific
and then back up into the Atlantic and it is what controls
climate, and is a tremendous heat sink on the planet. It is
a terribly important circulation system that affects everyone,
every living thing, and every aspect of physical processes
on this earth. And in my article Global Implications of Sellafield,
Irish Sea Coast Effect and Beyond, I described the science
and the explanation and the physical aspects of how this occurred,
and then I was able to document through this Indian scientist
the actual number of deaths of Indian infants who were killed
by the radiation from Sellafield carried halfway around the
world, and then I began to think about that when as the Fukushima
disaster rolled out and I realized they are doing exactly
the same thing in the Pacific from Fukushima. And that radiation
is being leaked into the sea. It is being picked up by coastal
currents and getting into the Great Conveyor Belt. It is being
carried around the North Pacific, down the coast of North
America, and then it sort of circulates out around the Pacific
in a great gyre, but it also becomes incorporated in the great
conveyor belt and will end up in the Atlantic. Now the danger
of that is this radiation washes up on the shoreline and causes
increases in chronic illnesses that we know from the after
effects of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, the after effects
of the nuclear bomb tests which occurred between 1952 to 1963,
when the Partial Test Ban Treaty ended atmospheric testing
by Russia, the U.S., and the UK, and then we know the effects
from nuclear power plants, and now Fukushima which is a new
form of actually nuclear war against civilian populations,
as well as the biosphere. So they have weaponized the biosphere.
Now, the second foreshadowing event was the earthquake that
occurred and damaged the Niigata nuclear power plant which
is on the west coast of Japan facing the China Sea, and exactly
opposite from where Fukushima is located. That happened a
few years ago, and I believe that was a foreshadowing event
for Fukushima. The third very strong indicator is the presence
of a U.S. Naval ship offshore when the Fukushima earthquake
happened, and that was the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan which seemed
to be standing by as the earthquake happened. And of course
this is a similar naval standby that was observed
off of New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina, off of Haiti
during the Haiti earthquake, and off of Sumatra during the
Sumatra earthquake and tsunami. So there seems to be a U.S.
Naval presence standing by each of these HAARP events when
they occur. So that is consistent, those three things are
consistent with a HAARP event. The government complicity seems
to also be consistent. We have seen it with the Haiti, Sumatra
and the Katrina disasters. And also with the BP disaster,
which occurred not very long ago in the Caribbean. Now in
Japan the government complicity was just absolutely horrendous.
TEPCO was appearing to be incompetent in its response, its
very slow and ineffective response to damages to six nuclear
power plants at Fukushima. Chernobyl was just one, and it
was a much smaller one, yet they had it under control very
rapidly within just a couple of weeks. But we have been nearly
two months now and Fukushima is not under control. Far from
it. Now it seems that TEPCO was not actually running the response.
The government and the regulatory agencies and the international
agencies such as the IAEA, the UN, and the WHO said very little,
but someone was running that response, and we now know that
it was the Department of Energy. I thought it was General
Electric, but I knew it was an American -- a U.S. Government
involvement because we have 14 military bases in Japan and
the Rockefellers bought up a lot of the disaster landscape
after World War II in Japan, including radioactive Hiroshima
and Nagasaki. And they have made huge fortunes in rebuilding
Japan and if you want to know who owns SONY, we thought it
was a Japanese company, but actually it stands for Standard
Oil of New York. So it is the Rockefellers who own SONY as
well. Now there were very low- level people left in the plant
and this is right after the explosions occurred which made
it impossible for cooling systems to work. But actually all
the reactors were in melt-down 90 minutes after the earthquake
because 90 minutes after the cooling system stops, a reactor
goes into melt-down, and there was no way to get the cooling
system started. The main cooling system that operates normally
has the pump down on the beach. Why in the world you put a
pump for a nuclear power plant where a magnitude 8 or greater
earthquake happens every five years, and the history of Japan
and tsunamis, I mean that is a Japanese word for these huge
tidal waves that are caused by large magnitude earthquakes,
so that would seem a very, very poor design. Also, the backup
first system, which was a diesel backup cooling system, was
in the basement under the reactor. Why in the world would
you put a power plant right on the ocean and then put the
back up cooling system under the reactor in a room, a basement
room, that would immediately be flooded? So it seems like
it wasn't just poor design. It seems like there was planning,
very careful planning, that would sabotage the safety of these
nuclear power plants in the event of earthquakes and tsunamis.
Of course the diesel system flooded. The workers tried to
get the pump on the beach to start up, they couldn't do that.
There was no electricity coming into the plant, so they resorted
to their last backup system, which is battery driven, and
even that couldn't work because a Stuxnet virus created by
the CIA with the help of Siemens and the Mossad was also involved.
It sabotaged the operating system in the power plant, and
no matter what they did to correct whatever they could correct,
including probably the software and the operating system,
it was immediately changed back to the sabotage code, and
this was done remotely through satellites, probably NSA. So
those nuclear power plants, all six of them, have absolutely
been in melt-down since 90 minutes after the earthquake. Also,
no expert engineers have been allowed in the plant. They would
know how to deal with this issue. This really requires the
aid of an international consortium of experts and governments
and military to resolve this issue. But it is too late now.
The molten fuel has burned through the bottom of the reactors.
Melted through the bottom of the reactors. It is in the ground
now. It has even melted through the bottom of the operating
plant. So the secrecy in the past week has intensified during
this first week of May, 2011. So it is not getting better,
it is getting worse. And the United States Government has
been complicit in this. They confiscated iodine supplies that
U.S. citizens should have been taking. Actually they should
have evacuated the West Coast of North America. We are all
terribly contaminated now. And they used weather modification
to cause two weeks of rain beginning March 18th to the 30th
when the highly radioactive dust and nanoparticles were arriving
in huge plumes that went all over North America, the Arctic,
Mexico, and then part of what was carried out to Hawaii in
that Pacific gyre that I mentioned, circulation system. And
when you look at iodine levels in the northern hemisphere,
Japan has the highest, this is radioactive iodine, Hawaii
has the second highest, which is nearly tied with the West
Coast of North America, but with slightly less, and that radiation
went across the Atlantic straight into the Mediterranean.
And North Africa, Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Turkey, and the
Middle East are all now contaminated. And it went over the
Northwest Territories and the Arctic into the North Atlantic
and contaminated all of Scandinavia and into Russia. So we
truly have a global radiation disaster that is not getting
better, it is getting worse every day, and this is two months
later. And, I mean just to really make it really clear that
the U.S. is complicit in it, the public health departments
in two counties that I have letters from, and I am sure it
was in all counties and probably all states, went out on March
17th, the day before the radiation arrived from the unit one
explosion, and all doctors, medical doctors were instructed
not to provide iodine tablets or any iodine protection to
patients who were concerned about exposure. There were also
people in full body suits in Santa Clara County which is where
Stanford University and Silicon Valley are, and they were
taking water samples in full high level contamination gear,
and they chased citizens and people away where they were taking
the samples. People were asking why they were doing it. And
the EPA did exactly the same thing as the World Trade Center
site. They were taking air samples with oxygen tanks on their
backs on the highest level of protective gear. Now we had
from March 18th to the 30th very, very heavy rains along the
Pacific Coastline, at least in California and I had reports
from Arizona, and these correspond to --these started on March
18th, the day the radiation arrives, and the military has
said since 1947, even in public newspapers, that the most
efficient form of nuclear war is to explode bombs in rain
clouds. Well, what they have done is substitute a nuclear
power plant on fire and releasing the same thing that comes
out of nuclear bombs into the global atmosphere, the northern
hemisphere. But what is here today is somewhere else tomorrow,
and it only takes about a week for radiation to arrive from
Japan in California. So what is going to happen is that, well,
President Obama took his family to the southern hemisphere.
He was not even in the northern hemisphere for two weeks after
the earthquake, and Governor Jerry Brown, whose sister works
for Goldman Sachs, in other words the Rothschilds and the
City of London bankers, he declared an emergency because of
the heavy rains and flooding. We were having an inch an hour
for two weeks in some places, and California has an average
of 14 inches a year, and this is also the end of the rainy
season, so why in the world would we have more rain in two
weeks than we have had probably in ten years? However, Jerry
Brown never mentioned radiation at all. And the EPA is not
reporting radiation levels from their 124 radiation monitorsall
over the United States. And what is really alarming, Alfred,
and I want the audience to be sure to not go out in the rain,
and if they have to, to cover themselves completely, including
gloves, because this radiation will go right through their
skin into their tissues and blood. And globally, the highest
increase in autism and diabetes, new cases, diagnosed, always
occur when the rain begins in countries and cities and regions
around the world. So clearly, something is washing out of
the sky, out of the atmosphere in the rain drops and in snow
that is causing autism and diabetes. And I when I went to
Japan, and I got the vital statistics of Japan, the government
data on health and disease, I was able to go back to 1898
before there was any manmade radiation in the environment.
That is the real baseline. And that data, when I put it on
a graph proved that the large rise in chronic illnesses since
1945 and the introduction of the nuclear age have occurred
with the introduction of nuclear technology.
2011-03-11
(for this date) In her 18 July 2011 interview titled
Fukushima
and the Global Danger, hosted by Dr. James Fetzer,
Leuren Moret explained sabotage programs aimed at both Iran
and Japan. The following are two transcript excerpts:
Leuren Moret: ...The U.S. and the Department
of Energy and Dr. Steven Chu and Dr. Koonan are controlling
the emergency response and they are controlling what TEPCO
does. And the documents that are being released jointly in
Japan by the Japanese government and the U.S. government --
actually a friend of mine hacked one of the maps of contamination
in northern Japan and underneath the top layer was the map,
was the same map, but it said "The Department of Energy."
So it is the Department of Energy that is coming up with the
maps, the numbers, measuring -- Dr. James Fetzer: That is the U.S. Department
of Energy? L. Moret: The U.S. Department of Energy is
running the whole thing. Dr. Fetzer: And it appears to me a cover-up,
right? A massive suffocation of real information about what
is going on. L. Moret: Oh it is the biggest cover-up about
the most serious nuclear issue that has ever happened in the
history of the world. And it will certainly contribute to
a major extinction. A genocide of, oh, many, many people in
the northern hemisphere...
L. Moret: ...The Stuxnet, virus, as I have
mentioned, before the break, was developed by a U.S team aided
by a Siemens team from Germany. The reason Siemens had to
be involved was because of all of the firewalls and the privacy
and everything of their computer language, and it would have
taken much longer for the U.S. team to unravel it or to get
around the protective software. Or they might not have even
been able to do it. So it had to be co-developed, and what
we know is that the U.S. gave the Stuxnet virus to Israel
and Israel delivered it to the Natanz facility where the centrifuges,
about 800 of them, were just destroyed by the virus. And that
virus appeared in Japan in October. It was discovered that
something like 62 computers were infected with it. However,
what is very strange is that in September of 2010, even though
the governor of Fukushima Province had prohibited MOX fuel
in any reactors in that prefecture, the MOX fuel, which is
a mixture of plutonium oxide and uranium oxide fuel was covertly
put into reactor number three at the Fukushima plant. And
in November or December an Israeli security team from Dimona,
which is the nuclear weapons facility in Israel, put a new
security system in that particular Fukushima I Daiichi 1 plant,
and they left shortly before the earthquake and tsunami caused
all the problems, and they must have been the ones who introduced
the Stuxnet virus while they were installing a new security
system. Dr. Fetzer: So who was responsible for this
again, Leuren? L. Moret: Well, the Israelis delivered it,
but --. Dr. Fetzer: So there was an Israeli aspect
to this. L. Moret: Yes. Dr. Fetzer: And the MOX fuel was a bad thing
to introduce here too. L. Moret: Well it was already prohibited
by the governor of the Prefecture in 2002. So obviously they
were sneaking it in, and the Stuxnet virus was already in
Japan in October, and the Israelis were there in November
or December or about that time. And so the whole thing was
a big set up. I mean all the forensic evidence is there. It
is irrefutable. The earthquake was a magnitude 9.0. They never
had a magnitude 9.0 earthquake reported in 1,200 years in
Japan...
2011-03-11 [for this date]Fukushima
Sabotaged by Stuxnet Virus? The TrutherGirls, April
13, 2011 [Editor's Note: This web page has the following links
to articles about the Stuxnet virus] Leuren
Moret says tectonic weapon and Stuxnet virus used to attack
plant http://www.examiner.com/article/scientist-japan-earthquake-nuke-accident-are-tectonic-nuclear-warfare Ralph
Langner says us/Israel made stuxnet http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12633240 Israel
says Israel made stuxnet http://english.pravda.ru/history/22-02-2011/116985-Israeli_general_boasts_authoring_Stuxnet-0/ who
is Ralph langner http://www.analyst-network.com/article.php?art_id=3684| stuxnet
spreads into china http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.f6fba55ad8f5e329c0c25bad9aa7b8d3.651 stuxnet
targets siemans controller: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/world/middleeast/16stuxnet.html?pagewanted=all yellow
rain in Tokyo http://www.prisonplanet.com/chernobyl-style-yellow-rain-causes-panic-in-japan.html japan
says it’s pollen! http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20110325a7.html those
with nothing are coping best http://www.independent.ie/world-news/asia-pacific/those-with-nothing-are-coping-best-2586577.html 2011-03-11Ware
[Were] American[s] working at Fukushima plants in 311 ? Posted
by Mochizuki, fukushima-diary.com, on May 29th, 2012 [Editor's
Note: Video of tsunami hitting the plant Here] (I
don’t mean American should not be in Fukushima plants
never.) The
video below was taken by a nuclear worker with “a cell
phone” on 3/11/2011 supposedly. It
captures Tsunami hitting the plants from a near hill. It was
used by TV Asahi too. However,
it sounds like they were speaking English. It sounds like American
accent to me. 2011-03-11 (for this date)Japan
Nuke Agency: 14 reactors at 4 sites were affected on 3/11 —
Fukushima Daiichi had most serious damage — Daini, Onagawa,
and Tokai also, enenews.com, March 7, 2012 2011-03-11 (for this date) On
3/11; 15 Nuclear Reactors In Japan Were Damaged, Not 3 or 4,
March 7, 2012 "According
to Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA),
the (3/11) earthquake and subsequent tsunami affected fourteen
nuclear reactors at four sites along the eastern coast –
the Fukushima Daiichi site (six reactors), Fukushima Daini site
(four reactors), the Ongawa [sic] site (three reactors) and
the Tokai site (one reactor)." Fukushima
Report Introduced by Top Official Hosono: “Other reactors
are all in considerably severe condition” — 14 total;
Dai-ni, Onagawa, Tokai — “Extreme situations, though
not much has been broadcast” (VIDEO) [See Lessons
Learned From Fukushima Dai-ichi (1. Press Conference. 2011.
10. 28) (26:32) It
took the nuclear industry OVER ONE YEAR to come out with this
news. Normally, any small disaster affecting a couple of hundred
people would be in the news nonstop all the way through from
beginning to end, and autopsy afterwards. But in this case,
potentially millions of people will die and/or get cancer, but
this news is not even mentioned. Does this have anything to
do with GE owning most mass media, along with a few other large
corporations that do not want to rock the 1% monopolistic energy
industry boat? The
news agency The Deutsche Welle, reported that 15 of Japan's
nuclear reactors were shut down after the 3/11 tsunami and earthquake
due to damage. http://enenews.com/deutsche-welle-15-japans-nuclear-reactors-currently-shut-down-due-damage. What
does this tell us about the safety of the nuclear industry?
What does this tell us about the transparency, truthfulness
and honesty of the mass media, nuclear regulators and utility
company involved in this cover up? What
is REALLY going on over in Japan at all of these nuclear power
plants? Why
does there seem to be a complete suppression of all news coverage
about this? 2011-03-11 to 3-16 [pertaining to these dates]
TEPCO
admits new reactor meltdowns by Mark Willacy, bc.net.au,
dated 26 May 2011. "The
operator of the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan says
there might have been partial meltdowns in its No. 2 and 3 reactors
from damage after the earthquake and tsunami in March. The
latest announcement means all three reactors with active fuel
inside the Fukushima plant, north-east of Tokyo, are believed
to have suffered meltdowns after the March disaster. The
operator of the facility, TEPCO, announced earlier this month
that the No. 1 reactor most likely had a fuel meltdown shortly
after the disaster. The
company says the pressure vessels in the reactors may also be
damaged. TEPCO
officials say damage to the No. 2 reactor fuel rods began three
days after the quake, with much of the fuel rods eventually
melting and collecting at the bottom of the pressure vessel
containing them. They
say the fuel rods in the No. 3 reactor were damaged by the afternoon
of March 13. TEPCO
officials say that the tsunami that followed soon after the
earthquake disabled power to the reactors, knocking out their
cooling capabilities. 2011-03-11 [for this date] New
NILU, ZAMG study: Release of radioactive xenon from Fukushima
more than double Chernobyl—
Largest in history — Started “immediately”
after quake by ENENEWS Staff, Oct 24, 2011 Excerpts
from the Oct. 21 joint press
release by ZAMG and BOKU [Emphasis Added]: “A
new study by an international team of researchers estimates
the emissions of the radioactive noble gas Xenon-133 and the
aerosol-bound nuclide Caesium-137 from the Japanese NPP Fukushima
Daiichi.” “The
main result of the investigation is that the emissions
from the power plant started earlier, lasted longer and are
therefore higher than assumed in most studies conducted
before.” “Regarding
the radioactive noble gas Xenon-133, the results indicate an
emission of 16700 Peta-Becquerel (1 Becquerel is one radioactive
decay per second, 1 Peta-Becquerel equals 1015 Bq). This
is the largest civilian noble gas release in history, exceeding
the Chernobyl noble gas release by a factor of 2.5.
There is strong evidence that emissions started already on 11
March 2011 at 6:00 UTC, which is immediately after the big earthquake.
Xenon-133 is neither ingested nor retained in the inhalation
process and therefore of less health concern, but it is important
for understanding the accident events.” “Regarding
Cesium-137, which is of high relevance for human health due
to its physical properties and the long half-life time of 30
years, the new estimate shows that emissions started earlier
and ended later than assumed in most studies so far. The total
release amounts to 36 PBq, which equals 40% of the Chernobyl
emissions. About 20% of the caesium was deposited on Japanese
territory, while about 80% was deposited in the water.” “The
study was conducted by a team of researchers from the Norwegian
Institute for Air Research (NILU) in Kjeller, Norway, the Institute
for Meteorology of the University of Natural Resources and Life
Sciences (BOKU-Met) in Vienna, the Austrian Central Institute
for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, the Institute
of Energy Technologies from the Technical University of Catalonia
in Barcelona (INTE), Spain, and by the Universities Space Research
Association, Columbia, MD, USA.” SOURCE:
20111021_fukushima_review.pdf Is
anyone else curious why the Xenon-133 release from Fukushima
is 250% higher than Chernobyl, yet the Cesium-137 release from
Chernobyl is 250% higher than Fukushima? h/t
radioactive.eu.com 2011-03-11 (for this day)Fairewinds:
Nuclear expert believes top lifted off Reactor No. 1 containment
BEFORE explosion (VIDEO), enenews.com, Feb 9, 2012 2011-03-11 (for this day)The
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: What Happened on "Day One"?
by Yoichi Shimatsu, globalresearch.ca, published April 16, 2011 2011-03-12H.A.A.R.P.
clouds! JAPAN QUAKE! (video) 2011-03-12 (for this day) Strange:
“Vertical earthquake” caused explosion at Reactor
No. 1, says NRC report on Fukushima — Did not impact other
units — Occurred March 12 at 1:36a ET, enenews.com,
March 7, 2012 Title:
USNRC
Emergency Operations Center Status Update, Source: Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Date: March 12, 2011 Link:
http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1122/ML11229A190.pdf As
seen on: Enformable
Earthquake / Tsunami Status Update Compiled by Executive
Briefing Team Status
of Japanese Facilities (This
information is compiled from available sources, including
press releases by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO)
and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)). At
0136 EST on March 12, 2011, a “vertical earthquake”
resulted in an explosion at the Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1. Other
units at Fukushima Daiichi and units at other sites were not
impacted by this earthquake. Explosion
occurred at Unit 1 following 0136 EST (March 12, 2011) earthquake. This
explosion was due to hydrogen.
2011-03-12 (for this day and following days)BLOCKBUSTER!
FOIA Documents Reveal NRC Cover-Up, Deception Over Fukushima
Nuclear Disaster by Tony Muga, The Intel Hub, February
27, 2012 According
to several stunning editorials
by authors Lucas W. Hixon and Joy Thompson on the website
Enformable.com, evidence obtained through an FOIA request reveals
a ‘cover-up’ by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
in an effort to conceal the severity of the meltdowns in Fukushima,
Japan... ...In
a January 18th and February 19th article analysis of NRC emails
and transcripts of phone conversations, dated just days after
the accident, reveals the nature of the cover-up: 1.Containment: “By Sunday March 13th, Elliot
Brenner, sent out an e-mail to upper NRC counterparts clearly
narrating the sequence of events. ‘While we know more
than what these (press releases) say, we’re sticking to
this story for now.’ writes Breener, during the weekend
he labled [labeled] ‘very hectic’.” In
regards to not fully utilizing twitter: “The NRC was using
their blog and the updates provided by the American Nuclear
Society as the main modes of communication with the public. 2.Selective distribution of information: “David
McIntyre also works in the NRC on public affairs, and spent
much of his time creating carefully crafted e-mails that constantly
downplayed the disaster, and any relationship that might be
made to the safety status of US nuclear stations. On
March 14th, McIntyre received an email [from] Molly McCrea,
a reporter for CBS inquired about the status of a law that Senator
Markey had authored that would distribute KI (potassium iodide)
to those living within a certain distance from a nuclear power
plant, and whether or not it was being followed. She asked whether
or not the pills had been distributed, and why the NRC had been
reported to be discouraging the distribution. McIntyre
replied vaguely alluding to the fact that the NRC was not solely
responsible, but that it was a ‘US Government decision,
not just the NRC but HHS [Health and Human services] and others.’
It is true that the NRC has worked hard against the burden of
purchasing, storing, and maintaining a fresh supply of KI for
those populations closest to nuclear reactors. In
2009, the NRC actually canceled it’s policy on KI distribution,
stating that it was unnecessary, as it did not protect against
all radionuclides that could be potentially released, would
cause undue stress on the community, and would delay critical
response time by adding more duties to local, state and federal
staff.” 3.
Deception: “It appears that McIntyre used his
own personal discretion on which information to release to specific
reporters or news services. On March 14th, he received an e-mail
from Molly McCrea again, this time asking if the United States
was possibly sending KI to Japan, or had sent KI to Japan to
help out, if he could confirm, and if not who should she contact. McIntyre
replied ‘We have not been asked to provide KI’.
He further explained, ‘We understand the Japanese authorities
have included KI as part of their protective action guidelines,
which would indicate they have some stockpiles.’ The
reply email was sent on Tuesday March 15th, 2011 at 4:07:00
PM. At 4:10:00 PM, only 3 minutes later, McIntyre rushed a quick
note to Matthew Wald, a long-time reporter for the New York
Times who has written on nuclear energy for years, with the
subject line-’KI Info’ stating, ‘Matt-I’m
told we distributed approximately 11 million pills. Dave.’” 4.
Hiding knowledge of a radioactive plume bound for the West Coast,
USA: Referring to a series of e-mails from David Lew
as ‘documents
3,4 and 5' : Thompson writes: “Yet
another caution to limit information given to the public and
a heads-up to ‘Expect the public/media focus to turn toward
domestic in the next day or so.’ IOW, by the afternoon
of March 12 the NRC was in full ass-covering mode for the U.S.
nuclear industry”... 2011-03-12Explosion
at Fukushima could only have been caused by a meltdown of reactor
core: Government Agency, by ENENEWS Meltdown
Caused Nuke Plant Explosion: Safety Body, Nikkei, March
13, 2011:
The
Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) said Saturday
afternoon the explosion at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant
could only have been caused by a meltdown
of the reactor core. The
same day, Tokyo Electric Power Co. (9501), which runs the
plant, began to flood the damaged reactor with seawater to
cool it down, resorting to measures that could rust the reactor
and force the utility to scrap it. … At
a news conference Saturday night, Chief Cabinet Secretary
Yukio Edano discounted the possibility of a significant leak
of radioactive material from the accident. “The walls
of the building containing the reactor were destroyed, meaning
that the metal container encasing the reactor did not explode,”
Edano said. … NISA
is affiliated with the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.
2011-03-12 WATCH:
Shock wave visible during explosion at Japan nuclear plant (VIDEO),
by ENENEWS 2011-03-12 (for this date)Japan’s
worst-case scenario assumed “significant public exposure”
to occur by end of March 12 because of pressure buildup that
would damage No. 1 reactor container — Explosion at No.
1 happened March 12, enenews.com, May 3, 2012 2011-03-12 (for this date)Wind
direction forecast was concealed after the explosion of reactor
1 posted by Mochizuki on November 17th, 2011, fukushima-diary.com. 2011-03-12 (for this day and the next few days)
Analysis: Melted fuel completely penetrated concrete in under
15 hours at GE Mark I — Shows little decline in speed
(CHART), enenews.com, 17 March 2012 2011-03-13Military
Crew Said to Be Exposed to Radiation, but Officials Call Risk
in U.S. Slight by William J. Broad "The
Pentagon was expected to announce that the aircraft carrier
Ronald Reagan, which is sailing in the Pacific, passed through
a radioactive cloud from stricken nuclear reactors in Japan,
causing crew members on deck to receive a month’s worth
of radiation in about an hour, government officials said Sunday."
[Editor's
Note: I'll bet the U.S.S.
Ronald Reagan got a whole lot more than just a
month's worth of radioactive contamination. The ship immediately
got out of the area at full speed, and according to subsequent
news reports it was used as a ferry for cars on its trip back
to the U.S. around Jan 2012. It has been scheduled for a full
year of refurbishment and repairs at its home port in Washington
state before rejoining fleet service. Sounds like a full blown
all-surfaces-scrub-down decontamination operation to me. Also,
certain high level doses of radiation can destroy the electronics
in combat aircraft, which makes me wonder about the portion
of its aircraft that have been sent to hazardous materials dumps,
making room to convert a pride-of-the-line $4.5 billion dollar
warship into a tramp ferry service for trans-Pacific car hauling
in Jan.] 2011-03-13 [For this day] The
moment when Edano lied to the people, posted by
Mochizuki on June 3rd, 2012 Following
up this article..Edano,
former Chief Cabinet Secretary admits he knew melt through on
3/13/2011 One
of the times when he lied to the people about meltdown / melt-out
remained in Youtube. [Editor's Note: See "The
moment when Edano lied to the people.mp4" (YouTube)] He
clearly stated meltdown does not happen on 4/19/2011. 2011-03-13 [for this date] Settlement
report 6/11 ~ 6/12/2012 – Believers posted
by Mochizuki on June 12th, 2012 [Editor's Note: this is part
of a series which describes Iori Mochizuki's personal experiences
and perceptions in the initial phase of the crisis. Three prior
segments are: Settlement
report 6/10/2012 -Hydrogen Explosion, posted by
Mochizuki on June 11th, 2012; Settlement
report 6/8~6/9/2012 -information, posted June 9th,
2012; and Settlement
report 6/5 ~ 6/6/2012 – beginning, (first
installment) posted June 6th, more background at 2012
Settlement report 6/4/2012, posted June 4th, 2012,
Settlement
report 6/1 ~ 6/3/2012 posted by Mochizuki on June
3rd, 2012 "...1
hour later, news paper companies finally reported the explosion
of reactor 1.
At first they didn’t even report it exploded, instead
“Explosive sound was heard, white smoke is coming up.” If
someone really wants to deny the truth, he would think, it was
just a sound, not an actual explosion. Another
one hour passed. Chief Cabinet Secretary held a press conference.
He announced, explosive sound was heard. Some kind of an explosive
phenomena might have happened. Because
they repeat “explosive sound was heard”, I even
thought reactor 1 had explosion multiple times. and it wasn’t
the explosive sound. It was an explosion. At
19:16 evacuation area was enlarged to 20km. It made me feel
like it was safe outside of 20km area, but the plume was already
coming down to Tokyo area. I
couldn’t believe the explosion because until that moment,
all the media announced no radiation was not leaking from reactor
1. It sounded as if everything was almost under control. At
20:20, Self Defense Force or Tepco staff started injecting sea
water to the pressure vessel but they had to stop it at 22:15.
Aftershock was still strong in North Japan. Any of those reactors
may explode because of the shock. They
injected sea water into reactor1. That was obvious that Pacific
Ocean would be severely contaminated. but I wasn’t confident
in my own sense of judgement about nuclear accident, I asked
my friend by email. He
is a researcher of genetic engineering in Tokyo University.
We were classmates from junior high school to high school. He
said, “Once
they put sea water into the reactors, that would be ok. and
politicians are still in Tokyo. That
means it’s safe here.” I
honestly was surprised at his immature sense of judgement. I
even thought it was me to be crazy. but
after all, he was proven to be wrong. He went to Tokyo University
not for his sense of judgement, just because he studied longer
than average. By
3/13/2011, the current situation was already set up. People
to think Fukushima was nothing vs people to think Fukushima
is crucial. At
this time, I was almost the only one to worry about Fukushima.
It was only reactor1 to explode, but I was already starting
to think about evacuating abroad. When Chernobyl happened, I
was still 2 years old. I just saw some documentaries about Chernobyl
when I turned to be 7 or 8 years old but I clearly remembered
it was utterly scary. People were sent to the hospital, but
the hospital was contaminated too. Tens of thousand people were
killed because of the government’s lie. The image of people
vomiting hard in the hospital has been sticking in my head since
I watched those documentary. I
didn’t know how closely Japan get to Chernobyl, but there
was no evidence to prove Japan won’t be like Chernobyl
at the same time. I
was even labelled as “selfish paranoid” on variety
of discussions on the internet. Still the main issue was / must
be Tsunami disaster. People living outside of North Japan were
sticking to the repetitive movie of Tsunami. Tsunami is visible.
It was more powerful than nuclear. However,
from my experience of Great Hanshin Earthquake (Jan 1995), it
was only the matter of time for them to stand up again. I am
truly sorry for the victims. but it was only the matter of power,
food, and concrete. Only enough amount of input reconstructs
most of the things because it was already over. Having
gone through the disaster, which is beyond our imagination,
human mind wanted the “reason”. Why did they have
to be killed ? What did cause the disaster ? They started needing
the logic to explain the mechanism. This
is like the starting process of religion. To remember and make
the pain easier, they want to “understand” what’s
behind the disaster. Some went to the theory that “America
attacked North Japan”, which I don’t want to touch,
and some went to the theory that it was nemesis. Majority
is the later one, they wanted to associate it with environmental
destruction and their personal decadent life style. They wanted
the simple logic “because we did something bad, we were
punished by god or earthquake.” (I mean the earthquake
and Tsunami, nuclear accident was obviously a boomerang of our
civilization.) Obviously,
this mentality doesn’t last long. Probably it lasts for
one month at the longest. but it had the harmful aspect from
the beginning – Underestimate Fukushima. They overrated
Tsunami and earthquake, they criticized people to concern about
Fukushima for not devoting to “atonement” -Sympathize
with Tsunami victims. What’s
more, it was manipulated by the government. The
slogan of “Support north Japan” was born at this
moment and it got the disguise as atonement by taking the risk
of radiation exposure willingly, and grew to be the group mind
which is killing the whole society right now. At the beginning,
it was only volunteer. Now it’s to accept debris, consume
contaminated food, and staying in the contaminated area. Even
on Facebook, I was criticized to spread the “harmful rumor”
about Fukushima. They say it interrupts the support for North
Japan. They said we must go to the disaster area for volunteer
support. Tones
of food, blankets and donation were sent from all around in
Japan and the world. but what the people in disaster area needed
was information, which was the most difficult to obtain. A lot
of the people were staying where the plume went in Fukushima
and they believed their shelter was safe. Also, even volunteer
people got exposed to go to the disaster area without knowing
anything. However,
I wasn’t allowed to talk about this. People
started tones of pointless things in the name of “support”. On
TV, they said let’s save power for north Japan. ..You
can’t stock electricity. Your saved electricity doesn’t
go to save north Japan. They
also said, let’s eat less to support North Japan. ..Your
saved food doesn’t go to North Japan to be eaten. This
slogan was changed to “Eat and Support North Japan”
a few weeks later. On
Twitter again, I heard the system called SPEEDI under Ministry
of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology exists.
They say, government has been investing billions of yen in it
and it is to simulate the motion of plume in case of nuclear
accident. However, the site was down. Now it is known to be
the biggest crime against human right for Japanese government
to conceal the SPEEDI data. but at this time, I was told, “Japanese
government is not that cruel to conceal SPEEDI. You are paranoid.
Face “the truth”. People in North Japan are in such
a pain.” This
wrong view over Japanese government origins from the lack of
historical knowledge.
From the Russo-Japanese War in the beginning of 20th century,
it has always been the Japanese custom for people to be killed
by the suicidal strategy. Through the past century, people were
always deceived and killed by its own government. It is famous
that the government tried to make Tokyo citizen fight against
american bombers during WWW2 with bamboo spears. Even
after WWW2, there have been historical public pollution such
as Minamita disease or Midori juji problem. Victims of all of
these crimes are still suffering and even though they were lucky,
they took years to get proper compensation. Now
the worst public pollution has started. People were blinding
themselves. Some were even thinking it looks brave and heroic
to act like they don’t care about radiation. Some of them
even thought supporting nuclear power looks more intelligent
because they look like they were not emotionally affected by
the minor accident in Fukushima and don’t miss the importance
of nuclear technology. but
the more I researched, the more confident I became. I quit discussing.
Though it takes months, I had no other choice to post correct
(may not look correct at that time but will be proven to be
right as time passes) information and gain trust of people step
by step. Anyway,
I understood the world has changed. I
sealed up the windows. Monday was coming. I
was interested to see how stock market would behave. 2011-03-14 [for this date]Japan
Fails to Disclose 10-T.-Becquerel Radioactive Fallout Estimate,
Posted by Mochizuki, fukushima-diary.com, on April 3rd, 2012
<Quote> Tokyo,
April 3 (Jiji Press)–The Japanese government has failed
to disclose a SPEEDI estimate that some 10 trillion becquerels
per hour of radioactive iodine was released into the environment
from the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant on March
14 last year, it was learned Tuesday. Using
the System for Prediction of Environmental Emergency Dose Information
and based on iodine levels monitored in Chiba, east of Tokyo,
the Japan Atomic Energy Agency came up with the figure on March
15 the same year, four days after Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s
<9501> nuclear power plant in northeastern Japan was ravaged
by the 9.0-magnitude earthquake and tsunami.
The independent government agency also calculated discharged
cesium-134 and 137, both also radioactive, amounted to one trillion
becquerels per hour each on that day. But
those SPEEDI estimates have never been disclosed to the public,
due to poor communications between the JAEA and the Nuclear
Safety Commission, informed sources said.
SPEEDI provides projections on the dispersal of radioactive
substances based on meteorological, geographical and other data.
(2012/04/03-17:59) Source
(English) Source
(Japanese) 2011-03-14 [for this date] (Japan)
Read This And Cry : The Message of Fukushima Unit Three (YouTube)
(19:47) Published on May 12, 2012 by Marygreeley1954. See The
Message of Fukushima Unit Three, TerraHertz 20120501,
for the script. An extract is as follows: ...The
Lesson At
Fukushima, a natural disaster broke all the 'failsafe backup
systems' in four nuclear reactors. Causing a chain of nuclear
disasters. But more significantly, during this cascade of expected
awful consequenses of wrecking a nuclear power plant's control
systems, something entirely unexpected happened. The spent fuel
pool of reactor number three experienced a 'firecracker string'
series of nuclear criticalities. If
there's any one detail of this whole tragic saga that should
prove finally and forever that humans are not capable of 'safe
design' of fission power stations and their fuel chains, it
is this. No one seems to have ever predicted that 'spent fuel
pools' are capable of firecracker-string rapid fire sequential
prompt criticalities. But
they are. In that video we hear and see it happening. Bang...
Bang... Bang... Nuclear fission power is dead. Every
single spent fuel pool, in every nuclear plant and storage facility
on Earth, has this incredibly stupid and dangerous design flaw.
Lose the water cooling system, and this can happen. Fukushima
Unit Three demonstrates it... 2011-03-14/15 [Pertaining to these dates] Radioactive
substances rose 5 km in air on March 14-15—
Carried by jet stream to US and Europe by ENENEWS
Staff Wind
carried radiation to Europe from Japan, researchers say,
Deutsche Presse-Agentur, June 22, 2011:
Radioactive
substances spewed from a damaged Japanese nuclear plant were
carried to Europe through the United States by a jet stream,
Japanese researchers said, Jiji news agency reported Wednesday. A
Japanese research group led by Toshihiko Takemura, associate
professor at Kyushu University, tracked the flow of leaked
radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant through
a computer simulation. [...] Radioactive
substances rose to about 5 kilometres when a low pressure
system passed over eastern Japan on March 14-15, the researchers
said. The
substances were blown eastward by a jet stream traveling at
a speed of some 3,000 kilometres a day, arriving on the US
West Coast on March 18, in Iceland on March 20, and many other
European countries on March 22, the researchers said. [...]
The
thyroid glands of children in Fukushima Prefecture were exposed
to radiation doses of up to 35 millisieverts following the
accident at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, the Nuclear
Safety Commission of Japan said Feb. 21. The
estimate is based on results collected in Iwaki, Fukushima
Prefecture [over 40 km SOUTH of meltdowns], late last March,
but not released by the government at the time. The
government’s local response headquarters tested the
thyroid glands of 1,080 children in Fukushima Prefecture on
the advice of the commission. According to materials released
by the commission, 11 of 137 under the age of 15 checked in
Iwaki had relatively high radiation doses in their thyroid
glands of 5 to 35 millisieverts [...] The
commission said that it advised the government’s Nuclear
Emergency Response Headquarters late last March to conduct
additional surveys on children with high doses, but that the
recommendation was rejected on the grounds that such measures
could cause alarm among the children and their families.
Fuel
rods at the quake-hit Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant’s
No. 2 reactor were fully exposed at one point after its cooling
functions failed, the plant operator said Monday, indicating
the critical situation of the reactor’s core beginning
to melt due to overheating. The
rods were exposed as a fire pump to pour seawater into the
reactor to cool it down ran out of fuel, Tokyo Electric Power
Co. said. The firm had reported the loss of cooling functions
as an emergency to the government. TEPCO
said water levels later recovered to cover 30 centimeters
in the lower parts of the fuel rods. The
seawater injection operation started at 4:34 p.m., but water
levels in the No. 2 reactor have since fallen sharply with
only one out of five fire pumps working. The other four were
feared to have been damaged by a blast that occurred in the
morning at the nearby No. 3 reactor. … It
is feared that the No. 2 reactor will follow the same path.
To prevent a possible hydrogen explosion at the No. 2 reactor,
TEPCO said it will look into opening a hole in the wall of
the building that houses the reactor to release hydrogen.
… [S]ome
reactors at the Fukushima No. 1 plant have lost their cooling
functions, leading to brief rises in radiation levels. As
a result, the cores of the No. 1 and No. 3 reactors have partially
melted. Read
the report here.
2011-03-14 [for this date]“Tepco
decided to evacuate F1 to hear the sound of China syndrome 3.2011?
Secretary of Ex-JP PM, posted by Mochizuki on June
21st, 2012 · 12 Comments Following
up this article..US
army was planning to drop coolant onto Fukushima plants by airplane Mr.
Matsuda admitted “China syndrome” is happening in
Fukushima in his interview. (cf.Corium
may have been penetrated completely 15 hours after meltdown) He
commented like this below In
the night of 3/14/2011, underground rumblings were heard in
Fukushima plant area, which was caused by melted fuel underground.
(He described the sound as “doon doon”.)
This is when Yoshida, the former chief of Fukushima stated “I
might die here.”, reported to Tepco’s head office
that they were going to evacuate all the nuclear workers except
for selected members. Reported head office of Tepco proposed
former Prime minister, Kan to evacuate nuclear workers from
Fukushima plants on 3/15/2011. This
was after the explosion of reactor3 (11:01 3/14/2011) [more
here]
2011-03-14 US
army was planning to drop coolant onto Fukushima plants by airplane,
Posted by Mochizuki on June 21st, 2012 The
former NHK news caster Hori Jun [LINK] moved to US and started
his news site called 8bit news [LINK] . He
had an interview with Mr. Matsuda, the policy secretary of Kan,
the former Japanese prime minister. In
this interview, Mr. Matsuda talked about 2 things below, 1.
There is elephant’s foot coming from reactor4, which is
produced from nuclear explosion. 2.
In the night of 3/14/2011, Japanese government and US army were
planning to drop coolant onto Fukushima plants by airplane and
cover the plants with sarcophagus. At
10:00AM of 3/15/2011, when Kan, former Japanese prime minister
was in the headquarters of Tepco, Kitazawa, Minister of Defense
gave US army the permission to use Yamagata airport. (At this
time, other airports of Fukushima airport and Sendai airport
were not available.) By
using one of those 2 airports of Hyakuri air base [LINK], Yamagata
airport, and USS Carl Vinson [LINK] in Pacific ocean, where
was upwind, US army was planning to fly to Fukushima plants.
To complete this mission, Japanese government needed to evacuate
all the Tepco workers from Fukushima plants but they ended up
not removing Tepco from the plant area, the plan was not realized
after all. [more here] 2011-03-14 [for this date] Reactor4
had one explosion and 2 fires in March 2011, Posted
by Mochizuki on June 20th, 2012 Tepco
published the in-house Fukushima accident investigation report
on 6/20/2012. In
this report, which is assumed to downplay the accident, Tepco
reported that there were 2 fires in reactor4 after the explosion,
and those fires were naturally extinguished fortunately. Also,
it is stated that they could not approach SFP4 because the radiation
level was too high. Tepco
is emphasizing the safety of SFP4 to say they can inject cooling
water even when another aftershock hits Fukushima, but it suggests
they won’t be able to reach SFP4 in case of another accident.
(cf, Tepco has no clue for the worst senario of SFP4) <Translate> 3/14/2011 10:30AM
Tepco tried to go to SFP4 to investigate the state but the radiation
level inside of the reactor building was too high, they couldn’t
enter. (The temperature of SFP4 was 84? at 4:08) <End> <Translate> 3/15/2011 6:14
AM Major impulsive sound and vibration were observed, and they
confirmed the roof of the reactor building was damaged. 9:38
AM Fire was observed at North West corder of the 3rd floor of
the building, but they confirmed the fire was naturally extinguished
at 11:00AM. 3/16/2011 5:45AM
Another fire was reported at the North West corner of the 4th
floor of the building, but it was missing at 6:15AM. <End> 2011-03-15(for this day or thereabouts)Busby:
Fukushima 'criminal event' calls for investigation (RT Video),
(4:47) "A newly released report on the Fukushima nuclear
crisis says it was down to the plant's operators being ill-prepared
and not responding properly to the earthquake and tsunami disaster.
A major government inquiry said some engineers abandoned the
plant as the trouble started and other staff delayed reporting
significant radiation leaks. Professor Christopher Busby, scientific
secretary to the European Committee on Radiation Risks, says
health damage after contamination will be more serious than
Japan announced." uploaded by RT 27 Dec 2011 2011-03-15 (for this day)Kyodo:
Radiation forecast can “by no means” be released
to public decided gov’t on Mar. 15 — Showed radioactive
cloud could spread over Tokyo area, enenews.com,
March 3, 2012 Title:
Ministry
leaders decided to hold nuclear data after Fukushima crisis,
Source: Kyodo, Date: March 3, 2012
The
science minister and other top ministry officials decided
to withhold radiation forecast data from the public four days
after the March 11 [quake ...] an internal document made available
Friday showed. Then
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Minister
Yoshiaki Takaki, lawmakers serving as top ministry officials
and top bureaucrats made the decision on March 15 to withhold
data about the predicted spread of radioactivity, which included
an assumption that all radioactive material would be discharged
from the crippled plant. Prediction
of the spread of radioactive substances, compiled from the
System for Prediction of Environmental Emergency Dose Information,
“could be by no means released to the public,”
the document dated March 19 showed. [...] The
document stated that radioactive clouds could spread from
the crippled nuclear power plant to the Kanto and Tohoku regions,
indicating that the ministry had made various estimates about
the spread of released radioactive substances, including the
worst-case scenario. [...]
[...]
On 15 March, an explosion was heard in Unit 2 and damaged
the pressure-suppression system, causing the leaks of radioactive
cooling water. Shortly afterward, Unit 4 was damaged by an
explosion and a large amount of radioactive materials was
released into the atmosphere. At 11:00 (Japan Standard Time)
JST on 15 March, Unit 3 explored [sic] again. At that time,
due to the easterly winds and precipitation in and around
Fukushima, the surrounding areas including Tokyo, Nagano,
Sendai and other places detected high radiation, which matched
well with the simulation results. [...]
Leuren Moret: ...The only really good data
that we have been able to get is from the International Nonproliferation
Treaty Monitoring Facilities that have very sophisticated
equipment. They can do air monitoring as well as make other
measurements. They are nongovernmental, so we are able to
get more information from them. And the Takasaki station in
Gunma, Japan, in the north of Japan, their reports were released
by the Ministry of Education. The data tables of their air
monitoring are extremely alarming. They expose that TEPCO,
and the Japanese Government, the U.S. Government, the Canadian
Government, are all lying, the international agencies. And
what the data table indicates that the largest radiation releases
from Fukushima were in the first week after the March 11th
earthquake. That is when the explosions occurred in Building
One, Building Three, where the MOX fuel was, Building Two,
and then Building Four. There were extremely high levels,
March 15th and 16th, reported in the data, but the data for
March 14th to 15th is missing, and that was when the explosion
occurred in Reactor 3, the MOX fuel pool. The first increased
radiation levels were detected after March 14th. So there
was some kind of very, very large event in Reactor 3 that
did not occur in the other reactor explosions. Now there were
some releases of radioactive iodine and radioactive cesium
on March 19th. There were more releases of radiation on March
21st, 30th, April 18th, and those were probably related to
activities that they were doing to try to respond. TEPCO was
trying to respond to an absolutely impossible disaster. Not
only is every reactor much larger than Chernobyl, but there
are six of them, and there were 600[000] spent fuel rods in
cooling pools. So this is the greatest radiation disaster
in the world and people don't even know about it. Now, on
March 16th, that is the only time that huge amounts of Iodine
135 were released. The half life is less than 10 hours. So
there had to be a nuclear event, and that coincided with the
explosion at Reactor 3. Mr. Hiroaki Koide of Kyoto University
mentioned this mysterious Iodine 135. The levels were so high
the Takasaki station could not even measure it. It went off
scale. The result is that he said the huge amount of Iodine
135 supports the speculation of a nuclear explosion at the
Number Reactor 3 Reactor on March 14th. We know now that it
was in the spent fuel pool. The land surface contamination
now from this data table indicates Cesium 137 as high as 80
curies or three million becquerels per square kilometer in
Iitate Village which is 37 miles or about 25 miles from Fukuoka,
and levels as high as 1.4 curies per square kilometer in Chiba,
which is 220 kilometers from Fukushima. So that is about 130
or 140 miles. This is horrendous. And the proof that this
is getting into all of the plant material, and contaminating
the whole environment and it is supporting the fact that all
of northern Japan should be evacuated, because a professor
Bin Mori of Tokyo University graduate school of agricultural
and life sciences, provided autoradiographs on his blog of
dandelion leaves. This actually shows the particles of radioactive
materials that landed on the leaves. This is supporting the
evidence and the reality that it is landing on all our food
here in the United States too.
2011-03-16 (for this day when helicopters poured water
on reactors) US
ex-diplomat pulls no punches on Japan by Shaun Tandon (AFP),
Jan 25, 2012
...The State Department sacked Maher as its Japan desk chief
just a day before the historic 9.0-magnitude earthquake but
he stayed on for another month to coordinate the US disaster
response. Maher
said that the US government was privately terrified over the
unfolding crisis. He accused Japan's then prime minister, Naoto
Kan, of evading responsibility and trying to pass the problem
over to the plant's operator, the Tokyo Electric Power Co. "I
remember sitting on a task force many a time thinking, 'Who
the hell is in control in Japan?' The government's not doing
anything. Kan made one trip and flew up and got in the way and
came back," Maher said. Maher
said that he watched in horror as he saw television footage
of a sole helicopter dropping water on the stricken plant. "Is
that the best Japan can do?" Maher said. "Frankly
what happened is the US government called in the Japanese ambassador
and said, look, you have to take this stuff seriously. We don't
know what's going to happen"...
2011-03-16 (for this day)NRC’s
Operation Center Fukushima Transcript Audio Clips March 16 2011,
posted by Mochizuki, fukushima-diary.com, on April 20th, 2012
This
is a very important initial evidence about what happend in Fukushima. Day
6. More
on here. 2011-03-16 (for this day), NRC
Operation Center Fukushima Transcript Audio Clips,
March 4, 2012 NRC's
Operation Center Fukushima Transcript Audio Clips March 16 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=gtnTnjko5BU&NR=1 Paraphrasing:
With Mark 1, with station blackout you are going to lose containment. Units
1 and 2 are "boiling down." No
walls on unit 4. "Lost geometry" on spent fuel pool
#4. The "side of the reactor building" (4) are gone.
No water in there at all. Paraphrasing
one person's articulation of worst case scenario: 3 reactors
in meltdown with primary containment lost and up to 6 spent
fuel pools in degraded condition possibly with spent fuel pool
fires. Another
speaker (paraphrasing): It has progressed to 2 multiple reactors
and multiple spent fuel pools and maybe 4 reactors and 4 spent
fuel pools. "We
haven't seen any mitigation of any events." "you
got to assume it is going to go to the final event..." Hat
Tip: Heart of the Rose http://enenews.com/press-release-tepco-working-prevent-break-structural-materials-3-spent-fuel-pool-spent-last-6-weeks-removing-radioactive-material-salt-corroding-structure/comment-page-1#comment-215171 2011-03-16 (for this day) Kyodo:
“Potentially up to six spent-fuel pools in a degraded
condition” -NRC transcript, enenews.com,
February 22, 2012. Title:
U.S.
worried about Fukushima meltdown early on: commission transcript,
Source: Kyodo, Date: Feb 22, 2012
The
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission released Tuesday some 3,000
pages of transcripts [...] The
documents showed that as early as March 16 [...] Jaczko projected
“a worst scenario” that all three operating reactors
at the crippled plant might be experiencing meltdowns. “The
reactors would likely eventually…breach primary containment
and have some type of (radioactive) release,” he said
during a conference call [...] The
prediction turned out to be accurate [...] The
transcripts also showed that Jaczko mentioned “potentially
up to six spent-fuel pools in a degraded condition, possibly
with spent fuel pool fires.” [...]
From: Boska, John
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 11:31 AM
To: Guzman, Richard
Cc: Pickett, Douglas
Subject: Developments in Japan
Importance: High
Rich,
please review and comment, for distribution to our branch. In
a briefing with Joe Giitter that just ended, we were informed
that the situation is now much worse in Japan. The walls of
the Unit 4 spent fuel pool have collapsed, and there is no
water in there. There were a large number of fuel assemblies
in the pool, and the fuel may no longer be intact. The radiation
levels are increasing so much that it may prove difficult
to work on the other 5 reactors at the site, which could lead
to more fuel damage and releases. [...]
2011-03-17
Toyko passengers set off radiation detectors at O’Hare,
WLS-AM's Bill Cameron and The Sun Times contributed to this
report. "The New York Post has reported that the same thing
happened in Dallas." 2011-03-17 Tokyo
Passengers Trigger U.S. Airport Detectors, Alan
Purkiss, bloomberg. 2011-03-18 (for this date)New
Asahi doc: NISA team knew of triple meltdowns by March 18 —
Kept secret until Tepco’s admission two months later —
Says melted fuel only ‘largely’ submerged in water,
enenews.com, March 4, 2012 2011-03-18Nuclear
Apocalypse in Japan: Lifting the Veil of Nuclear Catastrophe
and cover-up by Keith Harmon Snow, globalresearch.ca. As
the sun set over quake-stricken Japan on Thursday 17 March 2011,
we learned that four of six Fukushima nuclear reactor sites
are irradiating the earth,that
the fire is burning out of control at Reactor No. 4's pool
of spent nuclear fuel, that there are six spent fuel pools at
risk all told, and that the sites are too hot to deal with.
On March 16 Plumes
of White Vapor began pouring from crippled Reactor No. 3
where the spent fuel pool may already be lost. Over the previous
days we were told: nothing to worry about. Earthquakes and after
shocks, tidal wave, explosions, chemical pollution, the pox
of plutonium, contradicting information too obvious to ignore,
racism, greed -- add these to the original Four
Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Conquest, War, Famine and Death.
The situation is apocalyptic and getting worse. This is one
of the most serious challenges humanity has ever faced. The
U.S. nuke industry is blaming Japanese experts, distancing itself
from the monster it created. Instead of sending nuclear or health
experts to assist the Japanese people in their time of desperate
need, US President Barack Obama first sent teams of intelligence
agents and FEMA trained military grunts with special security
clearances. The Pentagon floated a naval strike force led by
the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan off the coast
of Japan: advertised as a 'humanitarian' operation, the strike
force was repositioned after it was partially irradiated. Can
we trust officials and the corporate news media to tell us what
is happening in an honest, timely, transparent manner? Are there
precedents to the nuclear crisis in Japan? What is the U.S.
defense establishment really concerned with here? Humanity
now faces a deadly serious challenge coming out of Japan --
the epicenter of radiation. Intentional efforts to downplay
or dismiss this catastrophe reveal the immaturity of western
civilization and some of our most acute human pathologies, including
our worship of technology and our psychopathology of denial.
The widespread distortion and cover-ups to protect private profits,
national and corporate interests, to fool and betray the people,
are unacceptable. Here are some of the deeper whats and whys
and hows -- some technical issues and the kinds of questions
people need to ask -- about the nuclear apocalypse unfolding
on planet earth. Prayers are not enough. It's time to question
everything, to put politics aside, to take personal action to
halt nuclear expansion and defend ourselves from this industrial
juggernaut... 2011-03-18 The
Amount of Radioactive Fuel at Fukushima DWARFS Chernobyl,
washingtonsblog.com. Science
Insidernoted
yesterday:
The
Daiichi complex in Fukushima, Japan ... had a total of 1760
metric tons of fresh and used nuclear fuel on site last year,
according to a presentation by its owners, the Tokyo Electric
Power Company (Tepco). The most damaged Daiichi reactor, number
3, contains about 90 tons of fuel, and the
storage pool above reactor 4, which the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission's (NRC's) Gregory Jaczko reported yesterday had
lost its cooling water, contains 135 tons
of spent fuel. The amount of fuel lost in the core melt at
Three Mile Island in 1979 was about 30 tons; the Chernobyl
reactors had about 180 tons when the
accident occurred in 1986. And
see this. That
means that Fukushima has nearly 10
times more nuclear fuel than Chernobyl. It
also means that a single spent fuel pool - at reactor 4, which
has lost all of its water and thus faces
a release of its radioactive material - has 75%
as much nuclear fuel as at all of Chernobyl. However,
the real numbers are even worse. Specifically,
Tepco very recently transferred many more
radioactive spent fuel rods into the storage pools. According
to Associated
Press, there were - at the time of the earthquake and
tsunami - 3,400 tons of fuel in seven spent
fuel pools plus 877 tons of active fuel in
the cores of the reactors. That
totals 4,277 tons of nuclear fuel
at Fukushima. Which
means that there is almost 24
times more nuclear fuel at Fukushima than Chernobyl.
Japan
said Monday that radioactive emissions from the stricken Fukushima
Daiichi nuclear power plant in the early days of the March
11 earthquake and tsunami disaster might have been more than
twice as large as a previous estimate, suggesting the accident
was more grave than the government had publicly acknowledged.
[...] The
agency also said it now estimated that the radioactive release
from the plant totaled 770,000 terabecquerels in the first
week after March 11. [...] The
agency suggested that the higher emissions estimate was equivalent
to only about 10 percent of the radioactive materials released
in 1986 by the explosion and fire at Chernobyl [...] But the
770,000 terabecquerels figure in fact comes to about 40 percent
of the official Soviet estimate of emissions from Chernobyl.
[...] Officials
cautioned that there was a wide margin of error involved [...]
NO-BID MAINTENANCE CONTRACT TO FORMER DEPARTMENT
OF DEFENSE UNDER-SECRETARY
SYSTEM NOT READY ON 3/11
RadNet
– the EPA’s front-line, radiological detection network is
severely
flawed and suffers from maintenance and reliability issues. The
lack of consistent data and the number of units offline (a
techie term for broken) at the time they were most needed
shows that the EPA was not prepared for this emergency. Besides
that fact the broken system left us all unprotected; the confusion,
apprehension and fear witnessed as people try to wade through
the incomplete and inaccurate data online is evidenced by
an
exchange on the UC Berkely website over this RadNet graph: The
graph shows that this monitoring station was one of the units
actually running on 3/11 . The readings were
significantly higher prior to 3/11 and drop to a
much lower level afterwards. This is an indication that
the units were running in an uncalibrated condition
and were adjusted only after the events at Fukushima. Who
is responsible for assuring that the system is up and running?
The EPA contracted this responsibility to a private company,
Environmental Dimensions, Inc. nEnvironmental
Dimensions, Inc (EDI) has provided maintenance for EPA’s RadNet
monitoring systems under asole source contract which can be viewed
at the end of this article. The base amount of the contract
is $238,000.00. This does not include materials and travel,
which is billed back to the government as needed. The
contract was awarded to what is stated as a “Woman-owned
8(a) Small Disadvantaged Business“. The disadvantaged
woman in this case is EDI company president Patricia
S. Bradshaw, former Deputy Under Secretary of Defense appointed
by George Bush. Could
it possibly be that the corporate management at EDI formed
the company not out of an altruistic sense of patriotic duty
but to cash in on inside information and connections?
Did Mrs. Bradshaw’s former DOD employment open the door? Did
the fact that she heads a woman-owned business give her company
a competitive edge? EDI’s
revenues have doubled in each of the past three years
and they currently have 90 employees spread across offices
in Albuquerque, Denver and Oak Ridge. [more here]
JAPAN’S
FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI ET AUDIO FILE, Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Saturday, March 12, 2011 MR. SHARON: This is Brian Sharon. Quick question,
well, not question, but I’ve gotten a couple of emails
here today, from some of the National Labs, and they’re
all — there are a couple of them chomping at
the bit, you know, saying, “Ghee, can we help?
Ghee, can we go calculate this,” with
the codes and all that stuff. I
keep telling them, “No, you don’t know the scenario,”
but you know, somebody might want to call DOE and
tell them to tell their labs to cool it, because
the last thing we want is the labs going off, talking
to the press, talking about consequences
and all sorts of other stuff, because you know, they’re
chomping at the bit, to do something, and I’m not sure,
Eliot, maybe you’ve got a point of contact up there
at DOE? MR. BRENNER:I’ll send a note
to their Press Secretary, asking him, through his chain, to
reach out, down to the labs and tell them to back
off. If we’ve got other chains, we might as
well – MALE PARTICIPANT: If I could chime in on
that? On the Deputy’s call yesterday, I was on with
the Chairman, and Pete Lyons was one of the principals at
DOE. Lyons may be a good source to contact at DOE. MR. JOHNSON: This is Mike Johnson. My other
thought was, it may be just to cut to the chase, just
to pass the same, to call the lab directors and say, “Knock
it off,” or whatever messages we want to get
to them. There
are a number of ways we can do this. So,
I agree, Brian, we’ve got to do it soon. MR. McDERMOTT: Okay, we’ll take that
action from headquarters.
2011-03-12 Japan
Nuclear Fallout Map Prediction March 12-18 (video). Shows
jet stream animation. Suggested link:http://www.stormsurfing.com/cgi/display_alt.cgi?a=npac_250 2011-03-13PSA,RADIOACTIVE
Iodine Lands In USA/Canada FOOD (video) 2011-03-14 to 03-24 (commentary mostly for
this period)Fukushima
Narrative in the US & UK: Suppression of Information is
the Norm, majiasblog.blogspot.com, dated October
30, 2011 I
would like to remind readers of the Zardov story. This story
involved a hacker who discovered that the Norwegian Institute
providing air dispersion maps of the radiation fallout from
Japan had 2 SETS OF MAPS, one was public and one was not. The
Zardov files are the private files that were hacked. They showed
radiation exposure levels much, much higher than the public
files did. http://globalcooperative.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/radiation-map-analysis-europe-australasia/ MAJIA'S
NARRATIVE
Japanese simulations estimated that radioactive dust was lifted
high in the atmosphere over Japan on March 14 and 15 by updrafts
and reached the U.S. via the jet stream by March 17th or 18th
(“Radioactive dust”, 2011). President
Obama went on record on March 17 declaring to U.S. citizens
that they faced no risk of significant radiation fallout in
the U.S. (Landau, http://articles.cnn.com/2011-03-17/us/nuclear.concerns_1_potassium-iodide-radiation-levels-radioactive-material?_s=PM:US). Despite
assurances, radioactive fallout occurred in the US beginning
in mid-March. On March 29,“Traces of radiation from the
crippled nuclear plant in japan” were reported as being
detected in states from California to Massachusetts but “state
officials say there is no public-health risk” (3/29 Hotz
& Levitz, 2011, p. A12). The
assertion of no public health risk echoed in media accounts
across the U.S. and Canada, despite levels of Iodine-131 three
hundred times background reported in March in British Columbia
(Landau, 2011; Smith
http://www.straight.com/article-419976/vancouver/group-wants-radiation-tests). Air
filter analyses conducted by independent scientists were made
public in June by nuclear engineer Arnie Gunderson. Gunderson
reported that scientists found high amounts of “hot”
particles of cesium, strontium, plutonium, uranium, cobalt-60,
and revealed that U.S. citizens breathed in on average 5 hot
particles a day in Seattle (citizens in Tokyo inhaled approximately
10 a day and those in Fukushima prefecture over 30 times that
amount Gunderson CNN and Fairewinds). Hot
particles lodge in bodily tissues and emit radiation as they
decay. In the right circumstances, one hot particle can cause
cancer. Furthermore,
the EPA’s own data documented high levels of radioactive
fallout in the U.S. The EPA’s data were eventually published
online, but were not publicized at the time of detection. Consequently,
public activist groups criticized the EPA for failing to notify
the public of its findings. For instance, the Seattle nuclear
watchdog group complained in July of 2011 that the EPA had failed
to warn the public of high levels of Iodine-131 detected in
rainwater. The level on March 24, according to EPA data exceeded
federal drinking water standards by 130 times (Chittim http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43720548/ns/us_news-environment/). The
mantra of no health effects from Fukushima fallout was in fact
orchestrated carefully: "No health effects are expected
among the Japanese people as a result of the events at Fukushima,”
read a statement issued by the Nuclear Energy Institute, the
nuclear industry trade group, at a June Washington Press conference
(cited in Grossman, 2011 June 16). The mantra was in fact a
propaganda campaign, as documents released by The Guardian prove. Two
days after the earthquake British government authorities contacted
nuclear companies including Westinghouse, Areva, EDF Energy,
and the Nuclear Industry Association to coordinate a public
relations campaign aimed at assuring the public nuclear is safe
in order to avoid resistance to a new generation of nuclear
plants planned for the UK (Edwards, 2011). In
April the UK office for nuclear development met with nuclear
companies in London to "to discuss a joint communications
and engagement strategy aimed at ensuring we maintain confidence
among the British public on the safety of nuclear power stations
and nuclear new-build policy in light of recent events at the
Fukushima nuclear power plant" (cited in Edwards http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jun/30/british-government-plan-play-down-fukushima). The
collusion between government and industry coupled with the apparent
willingness to deceive the public about the scope of the disaster
produced public outrage in the U.K. but was little remarked
upon in the U.S. press, despite the fact that Americans received
far more fallout than persons in the U.K. Public
assurances by the nuclear industry and western governments that
fallout from the disaster poses no public health risk were from
March onward contested by international scientific and medical
authorities. On March 30, Dr. Chris Busby published a report
on the internet warning of Fukushima’s health dangers
(BusbyThe health outcome). The Australian anti-nuclear activist
Dr. Helen Caldicott also warned early on of the dangers of fallout
in Japan and across the northern hemisphere in a video that
was published on youtube. These
warnings were largely ignored by the mainstream press, despite
the official documents by the international IEA, the U.S. NRC,
and the US EPA stating that there exists no “safe”
level of exposure to radionuclides. The
deliberate suppression of information about the dangers of ionzing
radiation from nuclear plants is not a new phenomenon. For instance,
Dr. Janette Sherman, a toxicologist and contributing editor
to the book Chernobyl: The Consequences of the Catastrophe for
People and the Environment claims was quoted by Carl Grossman
in an essay on the disaster and the nuclear industry as stating: “We’ve
known about radioactive isotopes for decades,” says Dr.
Sherman. “I worked for the Atomic Energy Commission in
the 1950s and we knew about the effects then. To ignore the
biology is to our peril. This is not new science. Cesium-137
goes to soft tissue. Strontium-90 goes to the bones and teeth.
Iodine-131 goes to the thyroid gland” (cited in Grossman
http://counterpunch.org/grossman06162011.html). Nuclear
industry officials and captured politicians rely on the public’s
poor understanding of ionizing radiation Grossman interviews
Dr. Steven Wing, an epidemiologist specializing in the health
effects of radioactivity, "The
generally accepted thinking about the safe dose is that, no,
there is no safe dose in terms of the cancer or genetic effects
of radiation. The assumption of most people is that there’s
a linear, no-threshold dose response relationship and that just
means that as the dose goes down the risk goes down, but it
never disappears…As the radiation clouds move away from
Fukushima and move far away to other continents and around the
world, the doses are spread out… "But
it’s important for people to know that spreading out a
given amount of radiation dose among more people, although it
reduces each person’s individual risk, it doesn’t
reduce the number of cancers that result from that amount of
radiation. So having millions and millions of people exposed
to a very small dose could produce just as much cancer as a
thousand or a few thousand people exposed to that same dose.” Finally,
Grossman quotes Joseph Mangano, executive director of the Radiation
and Public Health Project, who claims the denial of harm is
part of a larger cover up, “The absurd belief that no
one will be harmed by Fukushima is perhaps the strongest evidence
of the pattern of deception and denial by nuclear officials
in industry and government.” Mangano’s
belief that Tepco deliberately withheld and distorted information
was seconded by Dr. Robert Jacobs, Professor of Nuclear History
at the Hiroshima Peace Institute who in an interview with RT
described how Tepco "managed" the media and public
opinion by slowly releasing as "news" over 3 months
information that they had since the first days of the disaster
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_rAX9TzY2A). MAJIA
HERE: The point of posting this narrative is to remind readers
that we should be wary of any official pronouncements today
about the dangers of Fukushima. Lies have predominated and truths
have been buried in misinformation and outright propaganda.
2011-03-14 Nuclear
Expert: Radiation Could Spread To US West Coast:
Fukushima crisis escalates after second explosion,
officials admit reactor rods have been fully exposed,
by Paul Joseph Watson, Infowars.com "Nuclear expert Joe
Cirincione warns that radiation from Japan’s multiple
potential nuclear meltdowns could spread to the US west coast
and that the threat represents an “unprecedented crisis,”
as another explosion rocked the Fukushima complex and officials
admitted that nuclear fuel rods at reactor number two have been
fully exposed... ...
The Pentagon has also confirmed that radiation particles were
detected by helicopters flying 160km (100 miles) away from the
nuclear plant, suggesting widespread environmental contamination.
The discovery of the two radioactive isotopes, cesium-137 and
iodine-121, can only mean one thing, according to the Seattle
Times: “One or more of the reactor cores is badly
damaged and at least partially melted down." 2011-03-15 to 18 (for this date range) Live
in San Francisco? You Inhaled 75 MILLION Plutonium Atoms In
Just 4 days
(Video), posted May 10, 2012 In
order to make the EPA's Plutonium 239 detection from March 15-
March 18, 2011 understandable in terms people could visualize,
we calculated the distributed average number of Pu-239 atoms
inhaled by EVERY single person in the Bay area during that time
period. We also discuss the other radioactive elements detected,
and how the EPA's detection of Iodine-133 is especially troubling. We
hope the video will give people additional insight into the
topic of "Hot Particles". For links to the charts
shown and the associated assumptions and ground rules please
follow the link below to the original blog post on this subject
from April 2011: Four
Hundred & Eighty Two Lung Cancers from FOUR days in San
Francisco !?! Here
is an additional link to the EPA database so you may search
and verify the data for yourself. EPA RadNet
DATABASE QUERY 2011-03-15 Radiation
Map - Jet Stream Map - Japanese Earthquake (video),
FOX Newsinterview of nuclear expert
Joe Cirincione.
2011-03-15 to 2011-03-18 Four
Hundred & Eighty Two Lung Cancers from FOUR days in San
Francisco !?! by potrblog, posted 2011-04-24 [Editor's
Note: Calculated for the period 3-15 to 3-18]. 2011-03-16Forecast
for Plume's Path Is a Function of Wind and Weather, New
York Times Science.
2011-03-16Official
UN Forecast: Japan Radioactive Fallout Heading To US West Coast,
alexanderhiggins.com.
2011-03-16We
aren't immune just because we live in America (video)
2011-03-16 radiation
and jetstream forecast - Canada and USA - March 16, 2011uploaded by dutchsinse now
have TWO sites to monitor radiation for the UNITED
STATES here: http://www.radiationnetwork.com
and for the ONLY station that can be found for CANADA http://www.blackcatsystems.com/RadMap/map.html this
canada radiation station .. the ONLY ONE I COULD FIND is located
-- northwest of British Columbia -- perfect to see the prevailing
winds curling back up your way.. DO
NOT REFRESH THE HECK OUT OF THIS SITE, and guard it closely..
don't give it out via mass message.. don't want to overload
the servers like the USA site did yesterday. 2011-03-17ALERT:
US Surgeon General Warns “Be prepared for harmful radiation
from Japan,” blog.alexanderhiggins.com. 2011-03-18 (for this date) U.S.
Knew Within Days that Fukushima Had Melted Down,
washingtonsblog.com, I
noted
in May that that International Atomic Energy Agency knew within
weeks of the Japanese earthquake that the reactors had melted
down … but the public was not told for a month and a half. I
pointed
out in June:
As the prestigious scientific journal Nature notes:
Shortly
after a massive tsunami struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear
power plant on 11 March, an unmanned monitoring station
on the outskirts of Takasaki, Japan, logged a rise in radiation
levels. Within 72 hours, scientists
had analysed samples taken from the air and transmitted
their analysis to Vienna, Austria — the headquarters
of the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban
Treaty Organization (CTBTO), an international body set up
to monitor nuclear weapons tests. It
was just the start of a flood of data collected about the
accident by the CTBTO’s global network of 63 radiation
monitoring stations. In the following weeks, the data
were shared with governments around the world, but not with
academics or the public.
The
subject of evacuating the US citizens was raised in the
early hours on March 16 (local time). The US … already
knew about the unusually high temperature of the reactors
from the Global Hawk data, and determined that “the
fuel has already melted”. *** The
US high-ranking officials wanted to evacuate the US citizens
[Tokyo] but the local officials including Maher objected,
as “it would severely undermine the US-Japan alliance”
(The
Global Hawk is an unmanned aerial aircraft). U.S.
Knew Within Days that Fukushima Had Melted Down
2011-03-18Feds
admit radioactive xenon-133 from Fukushima detected TWO days
ago in Washington State, enenews.com. 2011-03-18 (for this day)Iodine-131
in eastern US may have exceeded EPA limit, enenews.com,
Dec 29, 2011 "As the study notes, the 4.2 mBq/m3 figure
`accounts for only about 50% of the total 131I in the air' as
only particulate species were collected. Therefore, around 8.4
mBq/m3 was likely in the air, which exceeds the EPA limit of
7.8 mBq/m3." 2011-03-18Fukushima
Radiation and Jet Stream UPDATE - USA, Canada, Asia - March
18, 2011 uploaded by dutchsinse 2011-03-18 (starting around this date and continuing
to the end of March) Paper:
“Now evidence has emerged that the radiation in Canada
was worse than Canadian officials ever let on” —
Radioactive coverup?, by enenews.com, Oct 11, 2011 VANCOUVER,
Oct. 20 — “Now evidence has emerged that the radiation
in Canada was worse than Canadian officials ever let on,”
Canada’s largest urban weekly, The Georgia Straight out
of Vancouver, reported today. “Public
officials in Japan and Canada alike jumped straight into Chernobyl-style
damage-control mode, dismissing any worries about impacts,”
writes The Straight’s Alex Roslin. The
paper has obtained Canadian government data showing a monitoring
station in Calgary detected an average of 8.18 Becquerels per
liter of radioactive iodine-131 in rainwater last March. This
“exceeded Canadian guidelines” according to the
paper. Health
Canada’s data on rainwater is “puzzling” because
the test results it reported are much lower than the data of
Simon Frazer University professor Krzysztof Starosta. “He
found iodine-131 levels in rainwater in Burnaby [near Vancouver]
spiked to 13 becquerels per litre in the days after Fukushima.
That’s many times higher than the levels detected in Vancouver
by Health Canada.” Read
More: What
are officials hiding about Fukushima? 2011-03-18 To
the reality deniers: its already far worse than Chernobyl -
Michio kaku
(video) (9:36) 2011-03-18 (starting around this date and continuing
to the end of March)Radioactive
iodine in rainwater: Public was in the dark by
Alex Roslin, montrealgazette.com, January 14, 2012 After
the Fukushima nuclear accident, Canadian health officials assured
a nervous public that virtually no radioactive fallout had drifted
to Canada. But
last March, a Health Canada monitoring station in Calgary detected
an average of 8.18 becquerels per litre of radioactive iodine
(an isotope released by the nuclear accident) in rainwater,
the data shows. The
level easily exceeded the Canadian guideline of six becquerels
of iodine per litre for drinking water, acknowledged Eric Pellerin,
chief of Health Canada's radiation-surveillance division. "It's
above the recommended level (for drinking water)," he said
in an interview. "At any time you sample it, it should
not exceed the guideline." Canadian
authorities didn't disclose the high radiation reading at the
time. In
contrast, the state of Virginia issued a don't-drink-rainwater
advisory in late March after iodine levels in rain in a nearby
city spiked to 3.4 becquerels per litre on a single day. That
was less than half of the level seen in Calgary during the entire
month of March. Radioactive
iodine also appeared in smaller amounts in March in Vancouver
(which saw an average of 0.69 becquerels per litre in rainwater,
up from zero before Fukushima), Winnipeg (which got 0.64 becquerels
per litre) and Ottawa (which had 1.67 becquerels per litre),
the data shows. These
other levels didn't exceed the Canadian limit for drinking water.
But the level in Ottawa did surpass the more stringent ceiling
for drinking water used by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. The
data still isn't posted on Health Canada's web page devoted
to the impacts of Fukushima. Pellerin
said he doesn't know why Health Canada didn't make the data
public. "I can't answer that. The communication aspect
could be improved",,, 2011-03-19First
West Coast radiation detection "RICHLAND,
Wash. - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland detected
trace amounts of the radioisotope Xenon-133 from the nuclear
incident at Fukushima..." [Undated]Questions
about Nuclear Energy that often go unanswered; Q Can a nuclear
reactor melt down, or can't it?, cavendishscience.org. [Undated]Japan
Nuclear Information, oahutrading.blogspot.com "Also
keep in mind that steel melts around 2500 deg F, Corium fissions
at around 5000 deg F "Blob temperature". The cute
little "blob" that TEPCO showed in their recent drawing
of a Corium out of the box was deceptive in size, the real mass
of the Corium will be !!!! 200 TONS !!!! of fissioning, poisonous,
super hot hell on earth. Y'all TEPCO boyz got a 200 ton blob
of stuff and you can't tell me where it is?" [Editor's
Note: Fact source cited: Questions
about Nuclear Energy that often go unanswered,
cavendishscience.org.].
Other
Animations and Simulations
CEREA
Fukushima Cs-137 Plume Spread Animation from eastern
Asia/Japan to central North America from 3-12 to 4-04. Radioactive
Materials Dispersion Model by Kyushu Researchers,
from 11-24 March. Description
at ex-skf.blogspot.com: "Using the supercomputer program
called SPRINTARS, researchers at Kyushu University and Tokyo
University created the simulation of how radioactive materials
from Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant may have dispersed throughout
the northern hemisphere. The researcher say their simulation
fit the actual measurements." Sirocco
Fukushima Forecast Bulletin. Web page has simulations
of spread of radiation via ocean currents Admission
of more types of fission products emitted by Fukushima,
published 2011-04-13 "To
date, the consistent claim from authorities is that 2 fission
products have been emitted into the biosphere by the Fukushma
Event. This
is most odd, given that the fission product inventory consists
of over 250 radio-nuclides." USA
/ Europe - Radiation and Jetstream FORECAST UPDATE - posted
27 March 2011. The comments section is as follows
[Editor's Note: On May 11th the Fukushima forecasts made by
the Norwegian Institute for Air Research, NILU, were suspended.
Most other services listed below became suspiciously inactive
as well, since emissions did not subside, but in fact during
many ensuing time periods intensified.] "Plumes
of Cesium 137, Iodine 131, and Xenon 133, have reached the United
States as of March 23, 2011. Higher
plumes, reaching 5000 meters (15,000 feet) are forecast to reach
Portugal, Spain, and central europe. All
animations are from professional forecasting services. Links
are below. http://www.woweather.com/ http://www.woweather.com/weather/news/fukushima?LANG=us&VAR=hysplitheight The
radiation flow, forecast and shown by these several models...
tells the tale of the isotopes coming our way... .. it will
be up to you to decide if you should go outside during the time
these clouds are over the USA, Canada, and Mexico... Radiation
forecasting links: http://www.woweather.com/weather/news/fukushima?LANG=us&VAR=webcam&SA... thanks
to youtube user androdameia for the below EUROPE radiation monitoring
link: http://eurdeppub.jrc.it/eurdeppub/home.aspx# Spain
radiation link: http://www.csn.es/index.php?option=com_maps&view=mappoints&Itemid=32 http://www.jaif.or.jp/english/ http://www.rivm.nl/milieuportaal/dossier/meetnetten/radioactiviteit/resultaten/ http://www.radiationnetwork.com/ http://www.blackcatsystems.com/RadMap/map.html http://www.epa.gov
(click on radiation update) http://www.irsn.fr/EN/Pages/home.aspx http://www.nucleartourist.com/ http://www.stuk.fi/index_en.html http://www.mext.go.jp/english/radioactivity_level/detail/1303962.htm http://www.nisa.meti.go.jp/english/index.html http://www.rivm.nl/milieuportaal/dossier/meetnetten/radioactiviteit/resultaten/ http://www.yle.fi/tekstitv/html/P867_02.html http://www.mapion.co.jp/topics/genpatu/ http://strahlenbelastung.wo-wann-wer.de/ Dutch
radiation monitoring: http://www.rivm.nl/milieuportaal/dossier/meetnetten/radioactiviteit/resultaten/ Swiss
radiation monitoring: https://www.naz.ch/en/aktuell/zeitverlaeufe.html Finland
radiation monitoring: http://www.yle.fi/tekstitv/html/P160_01.html www.yle.fi/tekstitv/html/P867_02.html French
radiation monitoring: (thanks to youtube user: RehKurts ! ) http://sws.irsn.fr/sws/mesure/index http://www.irsn.fr/FR/Documents/france.htm Jet
stream forecasting: http://squall.sfsu.edu/crws/jetstream.html http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/CT/animate.arctic.color.0.html http://nowcoast.noaa.gov/ http://www.srh.noaa.gov/srh/tropicalwx/satpix/nwpac_ir4_loop.php http://www.stormsurfing.com/cgi/display_alt.cgi?a=glob_250 http://www.woweather.com/weather/news/fukushima?LANG=us
&VAR=niluhemis131&... Austrian Meteorological
Plume Maps UC
Berkeley Depart. of Nuclear Engineering air and rain samples
[Rense.com] Potential
dispersion of the radioactive cloud after a nuclear accident
in Fukushima by the Rhenish Institute for Environmental
Research at the University of Cologne. An animated global map.
IAEA
Japan Nuclear Radiation Fallout Plume Simulation & Wind
Forecast Map, blog.alexanderhiggins.com Japan
Map of Japan Radiation Maximum by Prefecture Real
Time Japan Nuclear Fallout Radiation Graphs For US West Coast
Cities, blog.alexanderhiggins.com
2011-03-16 Forecast
for Plume's Path Is a Function of Wind and Weather,
New York Times, March 12-18 "A forecast by the Comprehensive
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization" [CSM
L.N.] Online
Geiger Counter Nuclear Radiation Detector Map EPA: Japanese
Nuclear Emergency: Radiation Monitoring Trace
analysis of German monitoring stations and other trace monitoring
stations worldwide[Rense.com] Real
Time Earthquake Monitoring [Rense.com] Modeling
the dispersion of radioactive releases into the atmosphere on
a global scale.
March 12-26, 2011 (YouTube video) Comments
"Modeling the dispersion of radioactive releases into the
atmosphere on a global scale. According
to this simulation, the cloud would now reached the north-eastern
Siberia, the United States and western Atlantic. It should reach
France from 23 or 24 March. Merger
expected to run from this model could be of the order of 0,001
Bq / m 3 in France and the overseas departments of the northern
hemisphere. As expected, the southern hemisphere is not significantly
affected by this large-scale dispersal. Fallout
sources on the web:http://www.watchmanscry.com/forum/showthread.php?t=17276 2011-03-19
[Asahi]Government
ignored U.S. radiation monitoring data in days after 3/11posted by Mochizuki on June 18th, 2012 As
usual, Japanese news paper has split personality. Japanese version
conceals every important fact but English version is very critical
about Japanese government’s policy. <Quote>
[Asahi] June
18, 2012 Even
as thousands of residents pondered the implications of the nuclear
disaster in Fukushima Prefecture last year, Japanese government
officials took little notice of up-to-the-minute high radiation
measurements provided by the U.S. Energy Department. The
Energy Department used its Aerial Measuring System (AMS) between
March 17 and 19, 2011, and compiled a detailed map of radiation
levels on the basis of 40 hours of flight time over Fukushima
Prefecture. The
data was provided to Japanese government officials, but not
released to the public. The
map clearly shows an area of high radiation levels extending
in a northwesterly direction from the crippled Fukushima plant. Thousands
of Fukushima residents living near the plant, unaware of the
danger they faced, evacuated in the direction of those high
radiation areas. This
is not the first time the Japanese government has been shown
to be slow to respond to the unfolding disaster at the Fukushima
facility following last year’s Great East Japan Earthquake
and tsunami. The
central government also failed to quickly release forecasts
of radiation spreading in Fukushima and beyond made by its System
for Prediction of Environmental Emergency Dose Information (SPEEDI). A
major difference between the SPEEDI forecast and the Energy
Department observations is that the U.S. data concerns actual
radiation measurements taken over an area with a radius of about
45 kilometers from the Fukushima No. 1 plant. The
monitoring showed that communities in a northwestern direction
from the plant, including Namie and Iitate, had radiation levels
exceeding 125 microsieverts per hour over an area as wide as
30 kilometers. Exposure
to that level of radiation for eight hours would exceed what
is deemed by the government to be safe over the course of a
year. According
to Foreign Ministry officials, the U.S. Embassy in Tokyo twice
provided data through e-mail messages. The radiation maps based
on the results of the AMS were provided on March 18 and 20. The
Foreign Ministry immediately forwarded the data to the Nuclear
and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) and the science ministry,
which is in charge of carrying out radiation measurements. According
to several science ministry officials, including Itaru Watanabe,
the deputy director-general of the Science and Technology Policy
Bureau, the science ministry and NISA not only failed to publicize
the data, but neglected to pass it on to the prime minister’s
office or the Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC). The
U.S. Energy Department released the monitoring data on March
23. A
department official noted that the information had been shared
with the Japanese government. When
asked by The Asahi Shimbun why the information was not used
to implement evacuation plans, Watanabe said: “While I
now feel that the information should have been released immediately,
at that time there was no thought given to using the provided
data for the benefit of evacuating residents. We should have
also passed on the information to the NSC.” Even
though 15 months have passed since the data was passed on by
the U.S. government, officials of NISA’s Nuclear Safety
Public Relations and Training Division said they were still
looking into whether they obtained the information in response
to repeated requests for interviews from The Asahi Shimbun. The
central government designated five municipalities in Fukushima
Prefecture for evacuation on April 22. That decision was made
after science ministry officials measured radiation levels on
the ground and carried out joint airborne monitoring with the
Energy Department. In
this way, they confirmed that areas of high radiation existed
to the northwest of the plant. Tokushi
Shibata, professor emeritus of radiation management at the University
of Tokyo, said: “It was a fatal error in judgment. If
the data had been released immediately, the situation of residents
evacuating in the wrong direction and becoming exposed to radiation
could have been avoided.” The
first hint that the science ministry and NISA had obtained the
radiation maps from the Energy Department came in late October.
However, uncovering what actually transpired ran into months
of bureaucratic stonewalling. In
explaining why existence of the radiation map was not passed
on to not only the prime minister’s office and NSC but
even the top officials of the science ministry, Watanabe said,
“At that time, we did not even know how accurate the measurement
data was.” Uncertainty
about the accuracy of the SPEEDI forecast was also a key reason
its existence was not made known to Naoto Kan, prime minister
at the time, and his Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano. When
Watanabe was further pressed on why the actual measurement data
was not released, he said, “At that time, the biggest
issue we faced was to conduct radiation monitoring ourselves.” Although
NISA officials will not publicly admit it, several government
sources said the radiation map information was passed on to
NISA. One
former high-ranking NISA official recalled that a large map
of radiation levels was posted on a whiteboard in a NISA office
used at the time as the central government’s emergency
response center. While
admitting to being impressed by the high technological level
of the radiation map, the former official said, “At that
time, we were doing everything we could to control the reactor
cores at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant. There was the thinking
that monitoring was the responsibility of the science ministry.” (This
article was written by Hiroo Sunaoshi and Kazuyuki Kanai.) <End>