Fukushima Radiation and Fallout Projections

26 June - 2 July 2011



Japan Radiation Map for June and July 2011, hosted at Japan Crisis Information Visuals,
Links: (2d GoogleMap), (3d GoogleEarth), Date: 2011/08/30,
Author/Publisher: IIDj - Institute for Information Design Japan, Tokyo,
Language: Japanese, English, E-Mail:


"A map of Japan indicating the levels of estimated accumulated external radiation exposure (0.01 millisievert or higher) in the two months after the crisis erupted at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant. Radiation spread over the sea in the map is not scientifically significant because radioactive substances that fall in the sea become diluted. (Provided by Japan Atomic Energy Agency)" caption from New nuke accident radiation map released by Tat suyuki Kobori,, 29 June 2011.





North America


Rense & Rifat - Fukushima - The End of the West as We Know It, (17:23) uploaded by JRense on June 26, 2011 "Some Graphic Images. Tim Rifat is saying the accumulative Japanese Radiation falllout will equal a 3rd World War, and coupled with the low Western birth rate, the West will become overwhelmed."


Editor's Note: Please see the entry "2011-06-30 PART 1of 3: EPA RadNet Radiation Data Censoring in Saint Louis Missouri March - June uploaded by potrblog below.




2011-06-27 Genocide in Japan: Cover-up of Radiation Danger by Govt & Media Silenced by Nuclear Industry (RT Video) (3:28)

North America and Europe

2011-06-29 Fox News: “U.S. is receiving a steady flow of radiation from Fukushima” — Media paying little attention to radiation in food, as if problem only involves Japan,
2011-06-30 PART 3 of 3: EPA RadNet Radiation Data Censoring in Saint Louis Missouri March - June 9 (video) uploaded by potrblog
2011-06-30 PART 2 of 3: EPA RadNet Radiation Data Censoring in Saint Louis Missouri March - June (video) uploaded by potrblog
2011-06-30 PART 1of 3: EPA RadNet Radiation Data Censoring in Saint Louis Missouri March - June uploaded by potrblog
Four specific types of censoring were found in the EPA data:
(1) Censored Data (deletions): Specifically Gross Beta, and Gama Energy Ranges 2 through 5, and 7.
(2) Censored Data (Burn-offs): Short Half life radiation was allow to burn-off from the sample by performing the sampling in time frames longer than the standard 1 hour sample collection time.
(3) Censored Data (short sampled): Sampling periods were cut short of their standard 1 hour sample gathering time; the result is a radiation count that is proportionally lower.
(4) Censored Data (early filter removal): Filters build up radioactive contamination. By installing a new air filter before the previous filter's useful life span has been reached, the subsequently recorded radioactivity will appear lower.
Based on my understanding of the RadNet's operational guidelines:
Samples are automatically captured every hour and sent up to the EPA to "review" the data before it is posted online. The air sampling cartridges are to be removed every 12,000 cubic meters and sent to the EPA for further analysis; this time may be cut short if unusual radiation detections are found.
As I searched through the EPA RadNet data for Saint Louis, I found two instances where a new air sampling cartridge was inserted and removed with in one or two readings and replaced with another new cartridge. The first such occurrence was on April 10th and was concurrent with all four types of observed censorship. The second occurrence was on May 25th and was concurrent with a large radiation increase.
The EPA website does state that "Electrical interference can cause spikes, shown on graphs as one point significantly higher than the rest of the data". However an examination of the data found NO such instantaneous spikes, only radiation increases predicted via previous upwards trends.
It is also interesting to note that the heaviest data censorship occurred in the early parts of the Fukushima disaster, where radiation levels would have been expected to be at their initial highest. Despite that heavy early point data censorship, the overall trending data from March through May shows a significant increase in radioactivity. I believe the increase is significant from a cancer causing perspective, but not necessarily from the perspective of inducing Radiation Sickness.
Hopefully the EPA will provide an alternate explanation of the above analysis and will support such an explanation by:
(1) Releasing all the RAW un-manipulated data
(2) Releasing all manuals and instructions covering the collection of such data.
2011-06-30 Fukushima Day 111- Radioactive urine NOW in children meanwhile USA receives STEADY FLOW of (particles), connectingdots1
"Very high concentrations" of hot particles in Pacific NW during April, May
TEPCO having trouble injecting nitrogen to avoid explosion at Reactor No. 3
All 10 children tested in large city 60 km from Fukushima meltdown have radioactive urine
98.6% of time air, contamination around Fukushima plant is not measured
Water boiling up from hole in floor at Unit No. 1
Fox News: "U.S. is receiving a steady flow of radiation from Fukushima"
Is Los Alamos Lab really safe from wildfire?
Los Alamos residents rushed out of town fearing future children
Trees and soil in Los Alamos area can have nuclear contamination

Forward to 03 - 09 July
Back to 19 - 25 June
Return To Contents

Short URL for this web page:

The Cowpens Flag, one of many circular star patterns used by "American Whigs" (or "Patriots")