Leuren
Moret: Fukushima-depopulation update; exposes Gen. Albert Stubblebine;
offers solutions
(50:57 ), uploaded by ExopoliticsTV, 15 May 2012, "In this
exclusive wide-ranging May 15, 2012 interview with Alfred Lambremont
Webre, independent scientist Leuren Moret, MA, PhD (ABD), updates
the viewing audiences on the status of the ongoing Fukushima
radiation-depopulation rollout, stating that "Fukushima
radiation has taken over our planet." Leuren Moret also
exposes inaccuracies in a recent Fukushima "Estimate of
the Situation" video by former Gen. Albert S. Stubblebine
(U.S. Army, Ret.). Stubblebine has publicly denied his involvement
in a secret 1968 - 73 DARPA time travel and teleportation program
despite direct eye witness whistleblower testimony to the contrary
by Washington State attorney Andrew D. Basiago. Leuren Moret
also offers solutions on how humanity can adapt positively to
the challenges of this Fukushima radiation false flag depopulation
plan, instigated by an international war crimes racketeering
organization led by the Dutch and British Monarchs and City
of London bloodline families including the Rothschilds."
From
Crack
on reactor 4 building posted by Mochizuki, fukushima-diary.com,
on May 19th, 2012. [Editor's Note: Top photo is a view of
Reactor Building 4 looking NE from its SW corner. The suspected
crack is between the parallel yellow lines. Bottom diagram:
aerial cross section showing spent fuel pool 4 in tourquoise,
which is two stories high on the third and fourth floors.
The top of the diagram faces east towards the Pacific, the
left side faces north.]
The notification reads,
This place is decontaminated.
Before decontamination ; 1.27µSv/h
After decontamination (4/19/2012) ; 0.21µSv/h
50cm from the ground.
[...]
The damaged Reactor 4 cooling pool was reinforced by workers
who went in and “jury-rigged” it after the tsunami,
but the structure still contains a massive amount of fuel,
[Arnie Gundersen, a nuclear engineer with Fairewinds Energy
Education] said. Reactor
3 has less fuel inside its cooling pool, but it has not been
strengthened since the disaster and poses a greater risk of
failing. “Reactor
3 has a little less consequences but a little more risk, and
Reactor 4 has more consequences but…a little less risk,”
he said. [...]
2012-05-19Reporter
at Fukushima Daiichi: Reactors seemed terribly threatened by
the slightest movement or upheaval of heaven and of earth,
ENENews.com 2012-05-19Again:
Three strong quakes in 15 minutes hit near same area as on 3/11
— M5.8, M5.0, M4.8 (MAPS), ENENews.com 2012-05-19Gundersen:
Japan is sitting on a ticking time bomb — “We’re
all in a situation of having to pray there’s not an earthquake”,
ENENews.com 2012-05-19CTV:
No. 3 fuel pool “poses a greater risk of failing”
than No. 4 — “Has not been strengthened since the
disaster”, ENENews.com 2012-05-19Officials
were concerned injecting seawater may cause a sustaining chain
reaction or re-criticality, ENENews.com 2012-05-19Watch:
Full 6-minute version of deleted video featuring Fukushima pediatrician’s
call for help, ENENews.com 2012-05-19Tokai,
majiasblog.blogspot.com Yesterday
I was reading about the seeming paradox of Japan being a nation
with extensive nuclear power infrastructures but no nuclear
weapons. I
must say that there have been suspicious events in Japan's history
that have called Japan's purported absence of a nuclear weapons
system into question. I
am going to write briefly about those suspicions because they
illuminate another issue that is currently ongoing in Japan,
that is, the status of the Tokai nuclear reactors. First
of all here is a headline from 1988: JAPAN'S
NUCLEAR PROGRAM STRESSES BREEDERS, PLUTONIUM AND SAFEGUARDS..Authors:Sweet,
William. Source:Physics
Today; Jan88, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p71-74, 4p. [MAJIA
HERE] Second, Japan processed its plutonium at Tokai. Despite
processing its own plutonium, in the early 1990s Japan started
purchasing and stockpiling plutonium from other countries. Below
find an article that is critical of Japan's efforts to purchase
plutonium from France and England and ship to the US Takagi,
Junzaburo & Nishio, Baku (1990). Japan’s Fake Plutonium
Shortage. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 46(8), 34-38.
The article explains that the Japanese have no fuel shortage
problem because they have been refining it for its “research
reactor projects. Until now, the fuel has been produced mostly
in the Tokai reprocessing plant, which began operating in 1977”
(p. 34).
The authors were criticizing Japan for plans to receive shipments
of plutonium from France and Britain. The shipments were scheduled
to start in 1992 and would cost Japan 20 billion yen ($130 million)
to ship. [MAJIA
HERE] Third, despite international criticism Japan continued
on with its plans to purchase plutonium from half way around
the world: Article
“Abandon Shipments” (1992, Oct).New Scientist;10
/10/92, Vol. 136 Issue 1842, p8
ABSTRACT" Reveals that renewed pressure has been levied
against Japan for it to abandon its plan to ship 30 tons of
plutonium from France to fuel its nuclear power program. First
ton of fuel expected to be shipped later this year; Criticism
by leaders and epresentitives of the Asia-Pacific Forum on Sea
Shipments of Japanese Plutonium; Most Pacific nations appear
reluctant to tackle Japan head-on. http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/9301103230/abandon-shipments MAJIA
HERE: the US allowed Japan to accumulate all this plutonium,
despite significant accidents with the reprocessing and breeder
reactors: United
States Circumvented Laws To Help Japan Accumulate Tons of Plutonium
By Joseph Trento, on April 9th, 2012 National Security News
Service http://www.dcbureau.org/201204097128/national-security-news-service/united-states-circumvented-laws-to-help-japan-accumulate-tons-of-plutonium.html [Excerpt
from Trento] "Thirty years ago even Japan’s harshest
critics might have agreed that perhaps it could succeed where
Western efforts had failed. But that optimism soon faded as
a string of nuclear catastrophes demonstrated that nuclear industries
are far different than any other. Both the Monju fast-breeder
reactor in 1995 and the Tokai reprocessing plant in April 1997
suffered serious, accidental radiation leaks; both accidents
were the subjects of attempted cover-ups. Most egregious was
the fire and leak of radioactive sodium at the Monju FBR. Japan’s
Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation (PNC),
the government corporation that operated Monju, lied repeatedly
to the public about the accident. PNC attempted to suppress
video footage that showed the cause of the accident: a ruptured
pipe in a secondary cooling system that had spilled an estimated
two to three tons of radioactive sodium – the largest
such leak in the history of fast-breeder technology. One of
the reasons PNC gave for releasing the misinformation was that
Monju was too important to Japan’s energy program to jeopardize
the reactor’s operation. In other words, the public’s
safety was secondary to the breeder program." [end
excerpt] MAJIA
HERE: For these reasons, some believe that Japan actually does
have a secret nuclear weapons program Secret
Weapons Program Inside Fukushima Nuclear Plant? U.S.-Japan
security treaty fatally delayed nuclear workers' fight against
meltdown by
Yoichi Shimatsu Global Research, April 12, 2011 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?aid=24275&context=va Yoichi
Shimatsu who is Editor-at-large with the 4th Media is a Hong
Kong–based environmental writer. He is the former editor
of the Japan Times Weekly. This article is first appeared in
the New American Media. MAJIA
HERE: Certainly, the stockpiling and processing of plutonium
and the insistence on breeder reactors raises eyebrows. Japan's
historic animosity with China provides the motive. HOWEVER,
even after setting aside speculation about whether Japan has
a nuclear weapons program, we are left with an alarming situation
at Tokai.
TOKAI is one of the reactors that has suffered damage. It is
also the location for reprocessing of plutonium and has been
for many years. This raises the question about what is really
going on at Tokai? [Alvarez
3/13/2011] “Meanwhile, Unit 2 of the Tokai nuclear complex,
which is near Kyodo and just 75 miles north of Tokyo, is reported
to have a coolant pump failure. And Japan's nuclear safety agency
has declared a state of emergency at the Onagawa nuclear power
plant in northeastern Japan because of high radiation levels.
Authorities are saying its three reactors are "under control.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-alvarez/meltdowns-japan-earthquake_b_835121.html Meltdowns
Grow More Likely at the Fukushima Reactors March 13, 2011 ·
By Robert Alvarez The
reactor at Tokai has leaked radioactive water and suffered a
fire http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/04/nhk-eu-to-defer-releasing-nuclear.html "Low-level
radioactive water leaks at Tokai nuclear plant" The Mainichi
Daily News http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20120320p2g00m0dm015000c.html TOKYO
(Kyodo) -- [excerpted] "Some 1.5 tons of low-level radioactive
water leaked from a storage tank of a nuclear reactor in the
process of decommissioning at Japan Atomic Power Co.'s plant
in the village of Tokai, Ibaraki Prefecture, the Nuclear and
Industrial Safety Agency said Monday..." Enenews:
Fukushima Report Introduced by Top Official Hosono: “Other
reactors are all in considerably severe condition” —
14 total; Dai-ni, Onagawa, Tokai — “Extreme situations,
though not much has been broadcast” (VIDEO) http://enenews.com/must-see-report-introduced-by-top-govt-official-hosono-actually-other-reactors-are-all-in-considerably-severe-condition-besides-fukushima-daiichi-14-reactors-total-dai-ni-onagawa-tokai MAJIA
HERE: A few weeks ago someone posted a comment at Enenews warning
about the status of the reactor at Tokai. The person warned
that it could very well explode this summer and the explosion,
if one occurs, would be visible from space. On
the one hand, this comment is purely speculative. On
the other hand, when one starts looking at the history of the
reactors at Tokai one sees that history is deeply entwined with
plutonium production, breeder reactors (which are inherently
unstable) and, potentially, nuclear weapons development. Perhaps
there more nefarious reasons for all the secrecy about the true
state of nuclear reactor conditions in Japan. . . .
. 2012-05-19Crack
on reactor 4 building posted by Mochizuki, fukushima-diary.com,
on May 19th, 2012 Following
up this article..Possible uneven settlement of reactor 4 A
crack on concrete of reactor 4 building has been observed since
last July. It’s
assumed to be from the first floor to the middle of SFP4. (Between
the two yellow lines on those pictures [Editor's Note: See them
Here].) 2012-05-19The
fact that high level of radiation causes multiple-headed plants,
posted by Mochizuki, fukushima-diary.com, on May 19th, 2012
Following
up this article..Double-headed
flowers From
1987 to 2003, it has been experimented to cause plants mutation
by radiation at Okinawa Prefectural Agricultural Research Center. The
purpose was to produce new kinds of rose (Samantha) for the
market demand.
The result shows 52mSv/h caused triple-headed rose. The
rose was irradiated for 16 months per generation. Because this
is not to know the lowest dose to cause variety of mutation,
the sensitivity of rose is not known. Also,
the effect of internal exposure of plants is not known either. The
experiment took several generations to make the mutated features
appear stably.
North
America
2012-05-13Tritium
in Swimming Pools, majiasblog.blogspot.com, Sunday,
May 13, 2012 Capt.
Clyde Stagner (Ret.) shared with me a letter he wrote to the
Maricopa Association of Governments and the EPA Capt.
Stagner is very concerned about the lack of monitoring of tritium
emitted from Palo Verde Nuclear Plant. The
only tritium monitoring in Phoenix is in drinking water. [CORRECTION
to original post: Apparently the EPA doesn't even do that: Clyde
corrects me here: "ALTHOUGH THE EPA COULD MONITOR Phoenix
's drinking water for tritium,the EPA does not do so. This is
frustrating because of the local airborne releases of tritium
verified by the EPA's measurements of tritium in Phoenix 's
precipitation. An EPA Rep stated That the EPA didn't have the
funds to monitor Phoenix 's drinking water for tritium."] There
is no monitoring of it in our air or precipitation (or water!) Unfortunately,
tritium can contaminate both air and water. I
am going to include below some excerpts from Capt Stagner's
analysis. "Tritium
is a radioactive contaminant with a half life of 12.32 years
and emits a low energy beta particle. Tritium, emitted as a
gas, combines with oxygen to form tritium oxide, or tritium
water... Tritium cannot be removed through filtering." Tritium
can be absorbed through the skin (or inhaled or ingested). MAJIA
HERE: I am going to interject here a finding about body's absorption
of tritium from a research article on internal emitters: "low
energy beta emissions from tritium (3H) decay have been shown
to have RBE (ratio of the absorbed dose) values of up to between
2 and 3 (compared to gammay rays), for in vitro end-points including
cell killing, mutation and induction of chromosomal aberrations"
(p. 144) Harrison,
J., & Day, P. (2008). Radiation Doses and Risks from Internal
Emitters. Journal of Radiological Protection, 28, 37-159. MAJIA
HERE: I'll provide some more sources for the unpleasant effects
of tritium at the end of this post but now back to Capt. Stagner's
letter: [paraphrasing]
Capt. Stagner notes that the EPA assessed tritium concentrations
in Phoenix precipitation from March 1985 to December 2010. The
EPA has since stopped collecting and analyzing tritium in Phoenix
precipitation. The
EPA HAS PROVIDED NO REASON FOR CEASING TO MONITOR TRITIUM IN
PHOENIX PRECIPITATION. Using
EPA data from 2010, Capt Stagner extrapolated the probable tritium
concentrations in Phoenix precipitation. Using
data about probable concentrations of tritium in precipitation,
Capt. Stagner has calculated the probable concentration of tritium
in swimming pools in the Phoenix area, based on the volume of
water. He
writes: "Swimming 2 hours a day during a six month swimming
season results in a dose of .... 1.927 millirem. Swimming 2
hours a day annually results in a dose of 3.908 millirem." He
concludes: "The latter dose exceeds the ALARA OF 3 MILLIREM" [ALARA
stands for As Low as Reasonably Achievable and is a regulatory
requirement. See http://www.ncsu.edu/ehs/radiation/forms/alara.pdf
for background] MAJIA
HERE: The data above only concern exposure to tritium through
swimming in pools. We spend a lot of time in swimming pools
in Phoenix in the summer because it is so hot. Kids, especially,
are in the pool a LOT during the summer. However,
swimming pools are not our only source for exposure to tritium. It
is clear that we inhale tritium in the humidity in Phoenix air
(mostly late summer when it is very hot and relatively humid)
and we no doubt ingest tritium through our food. Tritium
can be absorbed by plants and Capt Stagner notes in a personal
email to me that Phoenix reclaims water that may be contaminated
with tritium. Also, tritium may contaminate sludge used on land
(as fertilizer?) Text
of email from Capt. Stagner regarding tritium contamination
of wastewater and sludge:
More than 90% of Phoenix wastewater is highly treated and reused
for crops,power generation(utility), and turf irrigation(Ref:Phoenix
Water and Wastewater Facts) Part
of effluent from two major sewage treatment plants in the Phoenix
area, both activated sludge plants with chlorination (Ref:FAO
Corpoate Document Repository). As
of March 31,2004,ADEQ serves as the sewage sludge program and
enforcement authority in Arizona. EPA maintains an oversight.Bisolids(Another
name for sludge)Program is regulated under 18 AAC title 10.
Persons using biosolids for land application must register with
ADEQ. AZ
Dept of Health Services must approve and certify list of laboratories
to test biosolids. Their application, Section C-Solid waste
Methods,pages 33-41 includes the following listed under Radiochemistry
Tests required are: Alpha emitting Radium, Gross Alpha and Beta,and
Radium 228. Tritium
is not listed: its beta particle is low energy. This
application also lists Wastewater radiation tests of:Gross alpha,
Gross Beta,Radium total,and radium 228-tritium is not listed.This
license laboratory application also lists Drinking Water which
includes tritium,Page 2
In researching utility radiation reports to NRC, a container
of incoming treated water for cooling water was noted as contaminated
with tritium. This memory observation needs to be verified before
citation as recycled tritium is concluded In
addition,the 40 reservoirs of Phoenix Water require evaluation
for possible tritium contamination. The
best-clyde MAJIA
HERE: The upshot is that we in Phoenix are swimming in tritium
and no doubt ingesting it through other means as well. Tritium
is nasty and its biological hazard from absorption is greater
than comparable levels of exposure from gamma. The
EPA is not monitoring tritium in our precipitation, which contaminates
our air, our pools, and, potentially, our agriculture. Capt.
Clyde Stagner's book, Hidden Tritium, can be found at Amazon.com http://www.amazon.com/Hidden-Tritium-Clyde-Stagner/dp/1618631594/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1336946588&sr=1-1 PREVIOUS
POSTS ON CAPT STAGNER'S WORK http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/on-epa-censoring-and-failure-of.html http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/03/hidden-tritium.html http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2011/10/environmental-activism-works.html
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2011/12/phoenix-radiation-increases-and-why.html ADDITIONAL
REFERENCES ON TRITIUM Bridges,
B. A. (2008). Effectiveness of tritium beta particles. Journal
of Radiological Protection, 28, 1-3. Fairlie,
I. (2007) RBE and wg values for Auger emitters and low range
beta emitters with particular reference to tritium. Journal
of Radiological Protection, 27, 157-168. Harrison,
J. D. Khursheed, A., & Lambert, B. (2002). Uncertainties
in dose coefficients for intakes of tritiated water and organically
bound forms of tritium by members of the public. Radiation Protection
Dosim. 98, 299-311. Straume,
T. (1993) Tritium Risk Assessment. Health Physics, 65, 673-682. 2012-05-13ALERT!
Barium-140 Indications of Recriticality In Fukushima,
pissinontheroses.blogspot.com, Sunday, May 13, 2012
There are indications of Barium-140 contamination and detection
occurring in the USA between April 29th and May 8th of 2012.
The approximate 12 day half life of Ba-140 points to a SIGNIFICANT
and RECENT nuclear reaction, likely a recriticality from Fukushima. 2012-05-15Host
Questions Senator Wyden: Is there already a concern that too
much radiation has already headed our way? — “I’m
not going to speculate” (VIDEO), ENENews.com 2012-05-16 New
Gundersen Video — Plus: Local TV interviews anonymous
nuclear plant worker who exposes “dangerous” San
Onofre (VIDEOS), ENENews.com 2012-05-16Possible
exposure of Alaskan airline flight attendants from Fukushima
Posted by Mochizuki, fukushima-diary.com, on May 16th, 2012
2012-05-16New
York Times Trumpets "Fall-Out Effects Gone in 6 Months: 5 Navy
Doctors Tell AMA" After "Accidental" Contamination of Marshall
Islands, majiasblog.blogspot.com, Wednesday,
May 16, 2012 New
York Times Trumpets "Fall-Out Effects Gone in 6 Months:
5 Navy Doctors Tell AMA" After "Accidental" Contamination
of Marshall Islands FALL-OUT
EFFECTS GONE IN 6 MONTHS: 5 NAVY DOCTORS TELL A.M.A. 1954 PACIFIC
BLAST CAUSED MAINLY SKIN DAMAGE by ROBERT K. PLUMB Special to
The New York Times.. New York Times (1923-Current file) [New
York, N.Y] 09 June 195 The
lead paragraph reads as follows: [excerpt]
"Persons accidently showered with radioactive fallout in
the nuclear detonation in the Pacific on March 1, 1954 recovered
in six months from their major ailment—skin damage."
[end excerpt] The
article addressed the “accidental” fallout contamination
of people in the Marshall Islands. The article explained that
[excerpt]
“heavy fall-out eight after the detonation showered sixty-four
Marshallese with particles having, according to later calculations,
a radioactive level of 175 roentgen units. Exposure for a short
time to doses about 400 roetengens is believed to be lethal
for man.” [end excerpt] Other
Marshallese were also exposed to high levels. However,
as heralded in the title to the article, Navy doctors reported
at the American Medical Association meeting that those impacted
recovered. Full recovery seems somewhat amazing given the fallout
reportedly “whitened the hair of victims,” caused
nausea, diarrhea, itching and burning skin, watery eyes, hair
loss, widespread skin lesions, and blood changes that lasted
as long as six months. At
the close, the article did acknowledge that “Children
appeared to be slightly more sensitive to radiation than adults,
it was suggested.” Despite
this “mishap,” the United Nations upheld the U.S.
“right” to conduct hydrogen bomb testing in the
Pacific. The petition brought forward by the Marshallese that
testing be stopped was disregarded. Although
the Marshallese were considered fully recovered from exposures
of up to 400 roentgens after six months, the U.S. National Radiation
Protection Agency recommended that nuclear plant workers’
exposure limit be set at a maximum of three-tenths of a roentgen.
Prof.
G. Hoyt Whipple, a pathologist, was quoted by The New York Times
as recommending that figure be reduced to three-hundredths of
a roentgen because animal experiments showed that the three-tenths
dosage would shorten human life expectancy by ten percent over
thirty years. Prof
Whipple cautioned that the children of people exposed and their
succeeding generations were at risk from genetic mutations.
He was quoted as stating that the problem “is one of conservation—conservation
of the human race if you will.” References Special
to The New,York Times. "U.S. Backed in U.N. on Pacific
Tests." New York Times (1923-Current File), Jul 16, 1954.
http://login.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/112967394?accountid=4485. WILLIAM
L LAURENCE Special to The New, York Times. "Radiation Expert
Warns on Dosage." New York Times (1923-Current File), Dec
14, 1955. http://login.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/113165967?accountid=4485 MAJIA
HERE: Could flight attendants on Alaskan Airlines be experiencing
radiation sickness? The
Watchers: "Mysterious illness strikes hundreds of flight
attendants, causes rashes and hair loss – are ‘toxic
uniforms’ really to blame or is it Fukushima?" http://thewatchers.adorraeli.com/2012/05/16/mysterious-illness-strikes-hundreds-of-flight-attendants-causes-rashes-and-hair-loss-are-toxic-uniforms-really-to-blame-or-is-it-fukushima/ Majia
here: Although chemicals in uniforms certainly could cause these
symptoms, it is interesting that the flight attendants' ailments
match the ailments found in seals and polar bears recently in
Alaska as well. We
know from our history, as documented above, that the symptoms
of radiation poisoning will be denied and trivialized to protect
the nuclear-industrial-government complex. 2012-05-17 I
WANT TO KNOW!, majiasblog.blogspot.com, Thursday,
May 17, 2012 I
WANT TO KNOW! IS
THIS CRAP GOING TO KEEP COMING OUT UNTIL
IT STARTS GIVING PEOPLE IN EASTERN JAPAN, AND WESTERN CANADA
AND THE US ACUTE
RADIATION SYNDROME? I
WANT TO KNOW YOU SOBS WHO ARE HIDING THE INFORMATION! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLhb1W2lBm4&list=UUiO3EpYoV
9oYmCcNbRxBVtg&index=42&feature=plpp_video 2012-05-17
Joe
Rogan on Nuclear Power: It’s such a stupid **** idea —
So incredibly arrogant (VIDEO), ENENews.com 2012-05-18 Senator
Cantwell: “Almost as if there’s an attitude that
tsunami debris is top secret”, ENENews.com 2012-05-18TV:
U.S. now less prepared to deal with nuke disaster than before
3/11 (VIDEO) — Report: “Disregarding lessons of
Fukushima Daiichi the NRC secretively issued a new rule”,
ENENews.com 2012-05-18US
Senator: Japan tsunami debris will be worst single pollution
event to ever hit west coast of N. America, far exceeding Exxon
Valdez — Raises radiation concerns during opening statement
(VIDEO), ENENews.com 2012-05-19 ALERT!
Radioactive Fallout Identified In and On US Ground Beef,
Saturday, May 19, 2012 The
POTRBLOG team spent $1,100 dollars to have US ground
beef tested by professional labs for radioactive contamination
from Plutonium, Strontium, and Gamma producing radionuclides.
The ground beef samples tested were from a grass fed cow which
went to the butcher in July of 2011; the radioactive testing
occurred during the first week of May 2012. The
ground beef sample returned readings showing that the cow had
ingested radioactive fallout. The sample also had readings which
point to a recent nuclear fission and control rod fire occurring
within the last few weeks. The results of that testing are presented
in the video below. As
it stands now, we still have available PRE-Fukushima all natural,
grass fed beef, and pasture raised pork for testing. We know
exactly how, where and by whom the beef, and pork were humanely
raised. We also have access to fresh beef, pork, and chicken
raised under the same conditions. Our
goal is to independently and accurately determine what the true
risk the populace faces from Fukushima fallout contaminating
the food supply. We also believe we will be able to identify
specific farm conditions that will allow you to pick food sources
which have the lowest reasonable contamination risk. If you
are interested in knowing the truth and bringing that information
to the light of day, please use the DONATE button below. 2012-05-19Bill
Maher: “Arizona, nothing wrong with that state that a
crippled Japanese nuclear plant couldn’t solve”
(VIDEO), ENENews.com
[Follow
on comment] Morgan says: June 8, 2012 at 9:49 am Site’s
still frozen, and they seem to be having a nuclear meltdown
in Indiana. When will this site resume, and will they record
the spike they had yesterday?
Forestry
and Forest Products Research Institute measured high level of
cesium from field mouse caught in 30km and 70km area from Fukushima
plants.
patterns used by "