Note: This transcription provided
by William B. Fox, Publisher, America First Books
is reasonably but not completely accurate for research purposes.
He has supplied corrections or comments made inside brackets.
[1:11] OK, sounds like the music is fading out, and this is
your substitute host for Nuked Radio, Hatrick Penry. I am filling
in for Christina Consolo, aka RadChick. Some of you may know
me, some of you may not, but before I get started I want to
thank RadChick for this opportunity. It is both an honor and
a pleasure, because I realize how much time and energy is devoted
to a radio show and building it up and making it your own, and
so to turn that over to someone for an hour, that is like letting
them take your kid out to the movies that night, right? Hopefully
I do Christina, RadChick proud today.
we are going to discuss today is a very controversial subject,
and that is the NRC Freedom of Information Act documents pertaining
to the Fukushima meltdowns. Now I am not going to be discussing
the melt-downs themselves. A lot of people have spoken of that,
and that is out and in the open to some degree. But what I will
cover is the orchestrated cover-up that is proven inside of
these documents. You really get a broad feel for how these --
like if you go back to the BP oil spill, and you guys look into
that, you know that there was a no fly zone and a black out
and the mainstream media gave their version of the story. Same
kind of thing happened with the cover-up of the radioactive
plume and cloud from the Fukushima melt-downs.
so quickly I want to brief over -- I took some notes last night,
I said to myself, "What have I learned from these documents
from reading so many thousands of pages? What is it that I would
want to get across to RadChick's audience while I have this
opportunity?" So let me briefly go over what I have learned
from these documents pertaining to not just the cover-up, now,
because there is a lot of other interesting information you
can glean from reading through the Freedom of Information Act
one of the important things early on I realize that they were
suppressing and covering up, but you could read in these documents
a lot of detail about just the extent of the damage at Fukushima.
How serious it was, the catastrophe, and in fact the Japanese
forces inability to respond quickly and effectively. OK, that
is something they don't want you to know about nuclear power,
that when a big one happens like Fukushima, sometimes the rads
are so high, or the entryway is blocked due to debris, you can't
even access the plant to begin to rectify the situation. So
that is a serious concern that is revealed in the documents
and it is much suppressed by the NRC and the authorities here
in the United States. That is just briefly to cover that. We
will come back to that in more detail.
obviously the cover-up. OK, when you look in these documents
you see just who all was involved. It is a very broad involvement.
I will read you quickly some agencies involved, and indeed at
first when I got into the documents I said, "Well, this
is a United States cover-up. But it is more than that. It is
global because it involves obviously the IAEA, the International
Atomic Energy Agency, you will have to have like WHO, the World
Health Organization downplaying the results of these catastrophes,
so quickly, obviously, NRC, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the
DOE, the EPA, the CDC, HHS, DHS, FEMA, USED, DoD, and [U.S.]
Navy Naval Reactors, the White House, President Obama -- and
he called for a worst case scenario, so we know he had an idea
what was going on. Corporate-wise you had Bechtel and GE were
involved. Like I said, the IAEA, International Atomic Energy
Association, INPO, International Nuclear Power Plant Operators,
if I got that right, and NEI, National Energy Institute, which
had a password-protected database where the roof top grabs from
our nuclear power plants here in the United States, when they
picked something up, unless it was super low and miniscule,
it was forwarded up the chain of command to a password database.
part of what is really big in this is just the size and scope,
the staggering scope of this cover-up when you look at who all
was involved, and when you compare that again to the fact that
we begin to look at the thyroid study coming in by Sherman-Mangano,
I am sure RadChick has touched upon that, and if you look at
the initial assessment of the fatality index study by Sherman-Mangano,
and also Bobby1 has got a very detailed, in-depth study that
goes forward to the year 2030, where he has projected 1.3 million
American fatalities. So you put that in line with the
cover-up, and you see just that the fact that human lives are
being sacrificed to protect industry.
of you already know that children's cells divide at a higher
rate, that is why they talk about children thyroid doses in
the documents, and they are very concerned about that. There
is plenty of evidence they were modeling for the United States,
Alaska, Midway, and California, and so on and so forth.
in the documents they mention a number of times that they have
the benefit of knowing all about Chernobyl, OK? In the premiere
study on Chernobyl is the Cost and Consequences study,
let me bring it up here on my screen real quick. Chernobyl,
Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment,
and this is on file with the annals of the New York Academy
of Sciences. So in the documents when they say they have the
benefit of knowing all about Chernobyl, that is what they know.
When you look at that study and look at the fatality projections
for Chernobyl, well it is over 900,000, right? Because it is
not just the initial blast, people died, it is latent cancers
that really kick in.
I remind you at Fukushima Unit Number 3 was MOX fuel. When you
read about that, it was extremely dangerous because it is carried
aloft in aerosol, gaseous form. That is what we are worried
about. Our Navy ships and our sailors who were in close proximity
at the time. So they know all about Chernobyl.
they are not going to act on that knowledge. This is about a
cover-up. Three Mile Island [was a] cover-up. There was a cover-up
on Chernobyl by Russian authorities. We even had a salt
water reactor here that I have heard was a cover-up. We
had a meltdown. And a lot of people don't know that the Navy
had a purposeful, some 13, 14, 15 odd meltdowns
in Utah back in the 80's and late 70's just to test and
see what happened in a meltdown.
although the NRC and our authorities say potassium and iodine
is not a bad deal, you don't really need to have it, don't sweat
it, not to worry about it, all throughout these documents boy
are they sweating potassium iodine. They are shipping hundreds
of thousands of units to the Japanese. If one of the NRC leaves
his doses at home, there is a big stink about it. Hey, he left
his doses, let's get him some more doses of potassium iodine.
So whilst on the one hand they tell us over here, "Naw,
we are not a big deal, we don't stock it, it only protects you
against [radioactive] iodine anyway, on their trip to Fukushima
they ain't leaving without potassium.
also I have an article on the Navy ships and rads, where I discovered
a couple of documents that show what looks like they had plenty
of foreknowledge. They should have moved our Navy ships and
sailed them west [around the globe] into the wind. When you
look at these documents, clearly they were running worst case
scenarios. They were modeling a worst case scenario, but they
never acted on a worst case scenario. That is one of the big
things I push out there because while our sailors are suing
TEPCO, I have got a couple of documents with evidence I am asking
to be forwarded to these sailors that show, hey, it looks like
Navy reactors, NRC, and Admirals had a pretty good idea they
should have moved those ships, but to protect the nuclear industry,
you know if you move the ships, if you make any move to admit
there is a problem or take counter measures, again, that is
admitting there is a problem, and they cannot do that.
of you will remember the Surgeon General right after Fukushima
came out and said you might want to have potassium iodine. It
might not be a bad idea. Then a couple of hours later she came
back out again, and in the press just said "I made a mistake.
Now you don't really need it." It is almost as if she got
a phone call, so that is the way some of these things work.
to nuclear catastrophe is inhibited, in particular the ability
to speak freely and communicate openly because participants
know they are being recorded and their emails saved. Throughout
these documents they make references to the Freedom of Information
Act. That we are being recorded. Cut the conversation you are
getting a little too carried away. Two guys are having a conversation
about the melt-through sublimating through the concrete down
to the Taurus, and a guy says "OK guys, OK. You know, chill
out there, we are being recorded." This is a serious problem
if there is an incident in the United States, their ability
to respond to that is going to be restricted simply because
they don't want to be open and honest about the true nature
of what happens in a major catastrophe such as Fukushima.
I noted in the documents and had some information sent to me
by another researcher, that the NRC, Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
spends millions to search social media and online monitoring.
They want to know what we are talking about them, what we are
writing about them, what information we have discovered on them,
and then they can go in and take counter measures and have their
bloggers beat it down, send their trolls and shills out to attack
us in the threads and tell us we are wrong and what have you.
Again, this is a huge massive orchestrated effort to do what?
Control information, folks. That is what it is all
about. They don't want you to know the truth of nuclear power
and what really happens when one of these major catastrophes
in the documents, there is, it is called the saga of the Bechtel
pumps. Initially the water cannons they said were useless, nothing
has really happened there, looks good on TV but is not very
effective, and so they are trying to ship these pumps in from
Perth, Australia. And I don't have all the documentation on
this yet, but I have got another researcher Shazam [sp?] who
is going to get me the documents screen capture where it looks
initially, they would have just given the pumps, said here,
take the pumps and just get them to work and then try to cool
the stuff down and maintain the situation. But in the end, our
Department of Defense ends up paying $9.8 billion for these
pumps, and Bechtel owns the pumps. They are profiting from it
again. And indicative in the documents is certain places where
they say, "We'll start at $200,000, and then the price
went up, then it is millions, and then it is $9.8 billion. And
I am told reliably that there is a section in there, "Hey,
just take them, get them there and put them up." Who cares
about the money, right? So it looks by all accounts we got bilked
for $9.8 billion tax dollars, John Q. Taxpayer. OK, condition
of U.S. nuclear industry. It reveals also some information about
the condition of our plants here at home, for instance I have
a video on YouTube about non-seismically qualified spent fuel
pools Alexander Higgins picked up and carried that one as well.
You see in this email the guy says President Obama is calling
for a review of our nuclear plants, and he says, "We have
got to make sure and tell them there are spent fuel pools that
are not seismically qualified, of which I recall there are many."
The guy says, "So if we have a severe earthquake, hey,
some of our spent fuel pools won't be able to withstand it.
That could be a concern."
one of the big things I got out of this, maybe the biggest,
OK, and that is the consortium. OK, which in the documents they
say is the government and industry grouped together to handle
this catastrophe. But in the end I find that the industry holds
sway over government. They even say in the documents, I am paraphrasing
here, but the guy says that industry will determine the Federal
role in this disaster. That just blew me away when I read that
because at that point, I am like I have read about fascism,
and I know who Mussolini is, and I know a little bit about Italy.
My Mom has talked about it a little. But this seems to be a
hyper form of fascism, with the merging of the corporate and
the state is going beyond that, folks. That is like Bechtell
and GE and DOW and Monsanto and these huge corporations, transnational,
bigger than any governments, governments don't really exist
anymore. They are just there to do the will of these massive
transnational conglomerations and corporations. The consortium
is how I refer to them, so when I talk consortium, I am talking
about mostly the industry, these huge, whether it is the nuclear
plant industry, or you know Chevron, the fossil fuel industry,
or what have you, it doesn't matter. It is these huge corporations.
In the documents you see like Wow, shouldn't the government
define the role? Shouldn't the people whose representatives
go into allegedly a republic to represent us, and then when
they get there they really don't represent us because they are
in contact with the consortium, and the consortium, if you want
to get reelected, right, and GE as we all know contributed heavily
to Obama's campaign.
that in a nutshell, I am just kind of going over what I have
got out of these documents and what you kind of need to know
about it. I will come back into detail. I will read from some
screen captures, for instance, let me show you the one real
quick about the, they don't want to move the Navy ships because
it is going to cause them angst. You know, moving the Navy ships
would be an admission, beyond that 50 mile zone, and in the
documents you see that plume, chart of a plume headed to Tokyo,
like 75 km worth of a plume. They discuss 150 miles away they
are getting sensitive readings to be concerned about.
in this particular one here, I will read from the document.
This is Admiral Donald, with PACCOM with the Navy, and he is
speaking to a Mr. Burrows with the NRC, I will have to check
on that, yes, Chuck Burrows. Admiral Donald, this is in reference
to the Navy ships, and the plumes and the radiation.
Donald says, and a name redacted here, he says: [from page 25
of 110, ML130008A108.pdf]
is Kirk Donald. Just one correction on what you said there.
The particulate levels that are being measured, the ones that
reported in the two to 7 x 10 to the -9th region, those are
being taken on the U.S.S. George Washington that is currently
located in Yukoska, Japan, which is about 175 miles from the
worry too much about the numbers in this whole thing, folks,
because what I would stress to you is that is a zeolite cartridge,
and it is only going to test for iodine. What you need to know
is in the number three, unit number three [reactor], there was
MOX fuel. In these documents they never talk about plutonium
and they never test for plutonium. They test for cesium and
iodine because of the short half lives, but they never look
into plutonium. But as we understand, it is in aerosol type
form when one of these meltdowns occur with the MOX fuel payload,
and that is something to be worried about. So they should have
acted on the worst case scenario just based on that alone.
here is Mr. Burrow's response: [from page 26 of 110, ML130008A108.pdf]
BURROWS: Actually, Admiral, this is Chuck Burrows.
What we saw was the plume on its way. [Penry repeats: We saw
the plume on its way. We are still measuring 2 x 10 to the
-9th at this location 90 miles from the reactor plant, as
well as now measuring 10 to the -9th down in the Yukoska area.
The plume is an extensive plume. I mean, I have readings at
both locations that are above 10 to the -9th microcuries per
milliliter as far out as Yukoska and as far in as this 90
another section of this document, there is a quick back and
forth between two NRC guys, Charlie Miller and Marty Vergilio,
and they are talking about running a worst case scenario and
maybe having to move Navy ships. Charlie Miller says: [from
page 155 of 203, ML12052A111.pdf]
MILLER: If you are getting angst about moving naval
ships and things like that, the worst-case scenario isn't necessarily
the one you want to run."
VERGILIO: Right Charlie, this is what we're all thinking,
that there's, you know, you run at least two cases.
in the documents, it gets to the point where the guy says, "I
don't want to hear about worst case anymore because there are
so many worst cases now floating around out there. Don't even
say the word `worst case.'"
what you see is they keep running "worst case" until
it comes back with the least number of source terms possible,
in other words, the least amount of emanations from the disaster
site where they can downplay it and say, "Well, we have
run worst case models. We are going to chose the least of these
worst case models and we are going to promote that, right?"
then they still never would even act on anything as I thought
they should, because when they test it, sometimes the models
are only for three to five days of emanations. If it is only
three to five days of emanations, Hey, that is a real problem,
because I have just received information last night, a new report
has come out, it shows plutonium in the Pacific, strontium in
the Pacific, that is indicative that there has been a recent
fission activity to produce these particular elements. That
is my crude understanding. Again, I am not an expert on this,
I am just an average Joe Schmoe citizen that realized, Hey,
I am going to get radiated to death if I don't get busy and
try to do something to shut this archaic industry down.
of this is an energy monopoly, folks. It rides on the back of
energy technology suppression. I have a number, I have a photograph
I took out of a book where the Union of Concerned Scientists
is talking about 5,000 plus suppressed patents in the United
States alone. If your invention is more than 70% efficient,
or your solar cell more than 20% efficient, it is subject to
restriction or seizure under national security.
have the actual USC title code. I could read it to you. If it
threatens their version of national security, which really means
threatening their energy monopoly, your invention is not going
to go to market. They they will seize upon and restrict the
patent. If you try to privately produce it and bring it to market,
it is very difficult to do so when no bank will finance you.
no bank will finance you. That seems to be the problem now.
There is plenty of inventions. Many of you are aware of Stan
Meyer and his "water car," which uses electricity
to split hydrogen away from H2O. The hydrogen powers, just like
the back of a Dodge truck, like my truck. Hydrogen gas is routed
to the engine, it is highly combustible, more so than gasoline.
The byproduct is oxygen, OK, but that is not going to perpetuate
this petrochemical monopoly that we are all putting gasoline
in our cars.
understand that like cancer, if a cure ever did show up, it
would be seized upon under national security because so many
jobs again and livelihoods somehow depends on this.
they are worried about what? Collapsing the system. I say the
system is one that is so negative now, that might not be such
a bad thing, you know, when you think about it.
lets go into quickly, I want to discuss the extent of the damage.
This is very important you realize they are hiding this from
you. They don't want you to know that they knew for weeks there
was no water in spent fuel pool number 4. Now I had a screen
capture on my Wordpressblog, and when I went back it disappeared.
Well that was the one where they discussed the melt-through
in spent fuel pool number 4 down to the taurus.
guy said "Look, it has been without water this long, it
is going to melt down through the concrete, sublimate through
the concrete, and when it hits that taurus there is going to
be a big release."
though like, Oh, they are really worried about that. I think
that might be the one where the guy says, "Hey, calm down,
chill out, guys." They know they are being recorded. Don't
get carried away.
they don't want you to know that. They don't want you to know
that. And the Mark I containment system, my understanding is,
the spent fuel pool reservoir is on the top of the building.
It is above everything else, right? It is that brilliant of
a design. If you think of the Mark I containment, think about
it like Ralph Nader's old Chevy Corvair that he complained about,
right? He had a mission to let people know that the Corvair
is extremely dangerous, it is not a good design, it is a very
poor design. People are being injured in it, and he went and
tried to warn people about it.
the Mark I containment is kind of similar, except that it is
not easy to recall. You can't bring it back to the factory and
put a new electronic control module on it that easily. You have
to send someone into the field. You have to make modifications
in the field, and early on they had a problem with the Mark
I where they said, "Look, we need to install this hardened
vent, and again it was a generic requirement. In other words,
you can install it if you want, and if you don't, don't worry
about it." They said you needed this hardened vent to release
pressure in certain circumstances to avoid a criticality. You
might vent some radioactive material into the atmosphere but
you will save a larger disaster.
a lot of ours to my knowledge are not required to have that.
I have got a screen capture that says it is a generic requirement
on a hardened vent, so think of it like that old poor Corvair
design. That is indeed what they had in Fukushima. Worst of
all was the massive amount of fuel located in Spent Fuel Pool
number 4, and the fact that MOX was the payload in the number
quickly I want to read from an article of mine where I talk,
where I quote someone else, actually, I quote a guy named Prahull
Bidwy [sp?] . He is an Indian, obviously. He says, "Rector
3 uses mixed uranium, plutonium oxide fuel in the core. It is
called MOX. According to Edwin
Lyman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, "The use
of MOX generally increases the consequences of severe accidents
in which large amounts of radioactive gas and aerosol are released
compared to the same accident in a reactor using non-MOX fuel.
Because of this, the number of latent cancer fatalities resulting
from an accident could increase by as much as a factor of five
for a full core of MOX fuel compared to the same accident with
again, I stress to people they were running worst case scenarios.
Obama even called for one that was a fair, it was only for three
to five days worth of emissions, but it was a three source term
and two spent fuel pools, if I remember right, which is somewhat
fair. If you modeled it out for several months, or at least
a couple of months considering that you have no water and the
water cannon is not working, and if you acted on that, you would
have had to make a further evacuation zone.
miles is good, and it broke all the records I suppose. It was
at ten miles before. But really when we are getting plume models
out to 75 km, readings of 150 and the discussion of a plume,
and there is no testing for plutonium, and that is the kicker.
I can't stress that enough in these documents. There is a mention
of MOX fuel, but not plutonium.
as far as the extent of the damage, they had to bring in bulldozers
to bulldoze over dirt and rocks and debris and kind of cut what
they call shine back, this incredible amount of radiation. In
fact, there is a quote: "Lethal dose rates outside that
building." And the workers don't want to go in because
they know they are not going to last very long. So to access
the site, first you have got to bring bulldozers in, and then
talk about shielding on Humvees, maybe hanging lead shields
to try to get in there.
they are coming up with early on you can tell there is no quick
fix. There is no quick fix, and they haven't had a lot of practice
at this either, so they are kind of winging a lot of it as they
water cannons, we know were ineffective. There was a lot of
that on TV, but that was just for show. In the documents they
are very clear on that. There was minimal effect if any at all.
would add today, like I said a minute ago, recently or last
night I am hearing about a study coming out that shows plutonium
in the Pacific, strontium 85 and 89, something like that, and
they are telling these are indicative of recent fissions. So
if you think that those three to five days of emissions, and
then it stopped and you have nothing to worry about, wrong.
Their models were based on three to five days. And even then
some of them came back with some results to be concerned about.
But if you had modeled it correctly for the long period of time
in which these emanations are coming from, you have a "lube
oil fire" on March 14th which they know is not a lube oil
fire. They say that in the documents. And they say when it is
a fire, and the smoke is the worst according to the EPA.gov
Protective Action Guideline manual I was reading last night
that when there is a fire and smoke goes up, that is the worst.
Right, and that carries everything aloft.
lets go into the aspects of the cover-up. I read you who all
was involved. It was multiple agencies. It is the usual suspects,
right? Everybody already knows the agencies are by and large
in the upper levels corrupted and compartmentalized and indoctrinated
in this particular system, but what is staggering is just the
size and scope of who all is involved.
is told to stand down right off the bat. Let me read you this
particular memo here. This is the David Lew, March 12th memo,
and I will read from this memo where he says: [Ed. Note: from
page 38 of 395 of ML11269A172.pdf]
Deputies meeting at the White House with significant focus
on the nuclear event, continued monitoring to the situation.
then he says down here: [Ed Note: within the same aforementioned
letter on page 38 of 395 of ML11269A172.pdf]
Interaction with DHS, Department of Homeland Security, and
Federal Agencies including plume plot, possible exposure models,
and monitoring on the West Coast.
beneath that, it says that FEMA has stood down and operating
under normal weekend staffing.
despite the fact they know all about Chernobyl, and they have
all the benefit of knowing that, and even despite the fact you
have got guys like Congressman
Blumenauer writing letters saying [words to the effect]:
"Look, if China has put all their dust and smoke and what
have you, waste stuff is floating through the air over here
-- many people know that but they are actually testing for that
over here and they know we are getting blasted by China's waste
and everything -- he says: "How come we are not expected
that Fukushima is not going to affect us and we are in the Pacific
jet stream." I am not saying that perfectly well. I should
try to find this Blumenauer letter.
questions the fact that pollution, pollution is the word I am
looking for, [if] pollution from China hits us, why wouldn't
the Japan effect hit us, especially being that the commercial
pilots catch that Pacific jet stream, they piggy back on it
coming back from the Orient to save fuel.
have an explosion where the guy goes on to say it hurled parts
and debris a mile away. So in that explosion there must have
been a substantial amount of material carried aloft, nanoparticulates
in aerosol form. Gases being released, Xenon is being released.
It was quite a massive amount of emanations, and it is still
ongoing, is my understanding. There is a new report coming out.
As soon as we get ahold of that we can post that up for you
guys. I am sure everyone will be talking about it.
latest report prior to that is the Sherman-Mangano thyroid study
where they are showing, yes, thyroids have been affected from
fallout from Fukushima. Here is the, let me read you the Congressman
Earl Blumenauer of Oregon, again in 1986 Oregon issued rainwater
warnings from Chernobyl, and look at the position of Chernobyl.
Not in the jet stream, a little more in the Northern Hemisphere.
really had to have gotten blasted. It would just be against
all common sense to say there is no effect from Fukushima. In
fact, like I say, studies are coming in now, the mortality index
studies, thyroid studies. We will continue to see rises in cancer,
and they will blame it on anything but the environmental conditions,
Blumenauer is writing to Lisa Jackson of the EPA, and he says,
"I write to enquire about the potential risk to U.S. West
Coast communities from the explosion and release of radiation
from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear facility in Japan. In a region
that is already breathing air pollution from China, my constituents
are concerned about radiation contamination from the facility
reaching the West Coast. While a number of experts have indicated
that contamination in the U.S. as a result of the Japanese catastrophe
is unlikely, I would like to better understand the agency's
contingency plans and your plan for disseminating information
to concerned citizens."
they weren't going to give a lot to concerned citizens. Let's
take a look at the Elliott Brenner memo from March 13th, which
was sent to 13, 14 different people. He is just getting out
to the office of public affairs staffers. He wants them to know
what the game plan is. Here is what he says. Again, this went
out on March 13th. Early on, this is setting the tone for the
cover-up. [Ed Note: from page 6 of 358 of ML11206A947.pdf]
has been a very hectic weekend, and a good test of our crisis
is a friendly euphemism for our ability to cover-up. Our ability
to cover-up. A good test of our ability to cover-up. A nice
way of saying that, isn't it? Crisis communication planning.
you to the headquarters folks who sacrificed their weekends
(and their sleep) to come in. And thank you to the regional
folks who fielded a number of calls about our response and
the impact of the Japanese situation on our plants. Some things
worked very well -- the blog was a great way to get information
out besides our standard press releases, and NSIR released
access to YouTube and Twitter by mid-day Sunday so we could
do more monitoring of what information was `in the public
I have said, they spend millions to search media and the press
to see who is talking --mainstream as well, anywhere and everywhere
-- and they want to be able to respond to that.
goes on to say:
Please take the time Monday morning to review all the releases
that went out, and the blog posts as well. Please use these
to guide any media response you provide. While we know more
than what these say, we are sticking to this story for now.
Stay tuned as the week unfolds. We anticipate staffing the
Ops Center on a 24-hour basis at least through Wednesday.
Neil will help us out in that regard, and we may need to ask
for further regional assistance if we need to continue the
full court press through next weekend.
full court press, I put to you, is media suppression of information.
Information suppression. Full court press. Full spectrum. [Ed.
Note: Continuing with the Brenner memo on page 6 of 358 of ML11206A947.pdf]
The chairman has a hearing on the Hill on Wednesday morning,
which will occur a lot of my time, and may be the place where
we push out our message.
he goes on to say it is a marathon, not a 50-yard dash and so
on and so forth. Clearly right here we know more than what these
say, these press releases say, we are sticking to this story
in regard to these press releases, I made some notes here from
last night. I told you about crisis communication planning.
This is a nice way of saying covering up what really happened.
They have got like a tri-point attack: "press release,"
OK, "talking points," and "questions and answers."
you think about it, a press release is a one way street, folks.
They say something and it is like watching TV. You can't yell
back at Diane Sawyer or Brian Williams and say "No, that
is not true. Al Qaeda was built by the CIA and Pakistani ISI."
You can't say that back to them, so it is a great way to say
what you want to say, and leave it at that. Leave it at that.
points, well, wow, we all know about talking points, right?
This just tries to center and control the flow of conversation
and what they want to discuss. It is pretty obvious there.
where is the debate? Where is the open questions? It seems you
can not ask them in this country because the questions, you
know RadChick or myself or Kevin Blanche or Ms. MilkytheClown
or Alexander Higgins, the questions we want to ask, they are
not being asked by those able to ask.
Like for instance in the White House in the press conference
when Tony Snow or whoever the guy is comes out now and they
are asked questions. That is very carefully controlled. That
is a question and answer [session] where those press agents
are likely prompted with the question to ask, and they already
know the answer. And that is "questions and answers."
see, also there is talking points, press release, and Q and
A. Those are the three ways they are controlling information.
And there is plenty of talk in the NRC FOIA documents, there
is a lot of discussion about they want everyone's story to be
straight. They use terms like "alignment." We need
to make sure we have alignment on this. We need to be on the
same page, they would say. We need a consolidated viewpoint,
they would say. They are worried about a diverging perspective.
some of this, you have to kind of, you know the guy doesn't
say "OK we covered this, don't talk about that." It
is not blatant, but it is pretty obvious once you get the big
picture and read enough into these documents. Oh, it is really
obvious what is going on. And the truth is winning out now in
these studies that are coming out. Grass roots word of mouth,
that is going to spread. You are not going to be able to hide
what Sherman and Mangano, these two scientists are doing. It
is word of mouth, it will in time, just like it always comes
out, unfortunately maybe ten years later may be too long. We
have a meltdown over here, or some incident over here. That
is what we are trying to avoid. [34:28]
I am very clear, I am not for "safe" nuclear power,
I am for systematically shutting down or decommissioning all
nuclear plants, dry casking the storage, and releasing suppressed
technology. I told you guys about thousands of patents being
suppressed. If anything would compete with any of these monopolies,
it is quashed immediately and you don't go anywhere with it.
there is a password-protected database for roof top graphs,
nuclear plants over here were detecting material from Fukushima
but they like to say it is not of a level that would be dangerous
or a health problem. And again I say you look at these studies,
and in these documents when it really gets serious, and they
talk about measurements that are not super low that they can
talk about, that is when the redaction comes in. Now my understanding
is in a court case that redacted material can be viewed. Can
be viewed. So it is not totally out of the realm of possibility
we may one day be able to look into what is redacted in these
documents and really serious measurements, maybe some slipped
up and actually said.
again like I said, they know they are being recorded. They know
about Freedom of Information, where the emails are being stored.
Their phone conversations are being recorded. As time goes on,
people who weren't down with the plan early on, they kind of
figure it out and say: "Hey, you know not to say so much
and keep my mouth shut."
got an example where the guy is trying to avoid actually saying
the President's worst case scenario. He is telling the everything
scenario, and the guy says, you are talking about the President?
Of California? And he says yes, he really didn't want to say
it because, you know, it is like a Homer Simpson Do!
kind of moment. Do! Trying to avoid saying President's
worst case scenario. Here let me read it to you. I have got
it right here. [Ed. Note: from page 144 of 507, ML12052A109.pdf]:
Got it. Just kind of [Inaudible] add to the [inaudible]
when I say inaudible, they play the tape back, they conveniently
sometimes can't hear what the guy is saying.
Just kind of [Inaudible] add to the [inaudible] the wind shift.
Is that still in the forecast?
MALE PARTICIPANT: [Sometimes it is a male
participant. You don't get the full name, I don't know why,
you would think they would be proud to have their name associated
with nuclear power, right?] Right.
BRIAN: Did we ever get the -- I am trying
to think of what the best term is, the -- everything [Inaudible]
scenario back from -- I thought that was one we were going
to ask NARAC to run once they had time.
MALE PARTICIPANT: Are you talking about the
doses they saw all the way out in California?
is the "Do!" moment. Do! OK, we are trying to avoid
saying Do! out in California. We are being recorded. Freedom
of Information. They are trying to subvert and get around Freedom
of Information. It is very clear. That is another thing these
documents, like I say, they can't respond adequately because
they are trying to subvert Freedom of Information. So they can't
even talk about what is really happening.
as far as the cover-up, I just want to make sure I cover that
basic, we know more than this, press release talking point is
a huge aspect, there is so much to it. I have got a lot of screen
captures and documentation, and I have done a number of broadcasts
on blogtalk radio under Hatrick Penry Unbound, and you can go
in and listen. I have got thousands of hits on rads and Navy
ships with a conundrum. Leave Navy ships there and protect nuclear
industry or move them and then everyone knows it was ultra severe.
are already on edge about nuclear power over here now since
Three Mile Island. There is a cover-up on Three Mile Island.
A lot of people don't know, the Department of Energy was the
big player in that. They say well there is no emissions and
nothing that would harm human health, but they would settle
out of court for over a million dollars to a family with a Down
Syndrome kid, so that for me is indicative enough that they
knew there were emissions, they knew it affected some, a family
had a Down Syndrome baby, then they had to pay one point something
million out of court settlement, and hush it up, don't talk
Chernobyl same thing. Massive cover-up, neighboring countries
nuclear power plants detected emissions, made the phone call
to the Russian embassy and said, "Hey, what is going on."
of embassies, Ambassador
Roos, our Ambassador to Japan, he was denied certain plume
models. He said "Hit me with something that is not so nice
and easy." I am paraphrasing. He said, "Give me a
worse case scenario." They did not want to do it for him,
in fact, there is documentation here where China is denied a
plume model, because they say if we give it to China, then we
have got to give to all the other nuclear power plant operators
in the states, referring to the United States. They will want
to see that plume model too.
now that is just a big red flag right there because if it is
so innocuous, if it is not going to harm us, you would just
reveal everything, right? There would not be, one would not
withhold plume maps and you would not withhold documentation
from the ambassador from China or whoever. You would share freely
your information knowing that really the situation is not that
bad, as we said, and hey everybody come have a look. There is
nothing to hide here. But then you see this massive concerted,
orchestrated cover-up to hide and downplay the cloud, the radioactive
plume, and the effects of [it].
might add, when you look at some of these studies, you go in
and you look at Chernobyl. First of all, they say, the trolls
and shills will say "Well, it is not from Fukushima and
you know, bomb testing or whatever."
that was shot down early on when they used the "Fukushima
fingerprint." Even Fairewinds, Arnie Gundershill's site,
has got that on there.You can go in and look and say, "Hey,
they have proven what the West Coast was bombarded with was
from Fukushima, as a particular fingerprint."
when you look at the fatality index studies, there was one done
also during Chernobyl in the United States, and there was one
done after Fukushima by Sherman and Mangano. If you compare
that to what I call the Chernobyl-Fukushima bird study, this
is linked on covering Plume-Gate which is at Wordpressblog,
you can watch this scientist's video, where during Chernobyl
he was studying birds on the West Coast in the mountains, and
during Fukushima he was studying birds on the West Coast and
in the mountains, and the effects were the same in the fatality
index rate, the deaths of the baby birds. Because the baby birds
would eat the leaves with the cesium and iodine and plutonium
and strontium land on. Then when the insects eat that, and then
the baby birds eat the insects, and then that is the end of
the story. There is a very high mortality among the baby birds.
This was not just Chernobyl, but the same thing happened during
Fukushima. So we know that it is from Fukushima. We know we
have been affected by it.
tell people even without the FOIA documents, considering what
we know about Three Mile, Chernobyl, et cetera, et cetera, really
for France to give rainwater warnings, and we didn't give any
-- for Taiwan to school kids home when radioactivity was ten
times the amount in the rain here in California -- OK, that
is a problem. That means the fascists, the corporatocracy, is
more concerned about profits. We are on a need to know basis.
If it affects protects profits, we don't need to know.
me read you a screen capture of a title of an Alexander Higgins
blog article. He published some of my stuff back in the day
when it was very controversial. People don't want to hear about
Fukushima. People don't want to hear about people that don't
want to talk about the NRC documents and this cover-up contained
within. But Higgins did publish me, and the title of this article
is "Confirmed: EPA Rigged RadNet Japan Nuclear Radiation
Monitoring Equipment To Report Lower Levels of Fukushima Fallout."
how he discovered that is he looked at the baseline prior to
Fukushima, and then after they rigged it, it actually dropped
to below what the original baseline was, OK? That is how much
of a misadjustment they made, and they went too far. If you
look further into this, you will find the whole RadNet system
was pretty much underfunded, under-maintained, and under-run.
It was a George Bush crony, I can't remember her name, but I
have seen a picture of the building it was run out of. You would
think it was abandoned or something, right? So it plays into
their hands to not have all their monitors functioning at any
given time to be able to re-calibrate, that is a friendly way
of saying rig the monitors, right? Although EPA and DOE were
heading up, especially EPA the monitoring over here, they weren't
about to say anything about it.
guys probably already know all about EPA, FDA, and those guys.
Again, like I say, most of these alphabet agencies were compromised
a long time ago. OK, that quote about JFK and the ruthless and
monolithic conspiracy, he knew about it back then in the 1960's
before many of us were even born.
I talked about [how] we have the benefits of knowing about Chernobyl.
Let me read you this one little screen capture here from the
FOIA documents where they say that. It says again: [Ed. Note:
from page 153 of 507, ML12052A109.pdf]
PARTICIPANT: [Penry: We don't know who this participant
is.] But that all can be found when indictments are issued
and people are hauled into court and questioned]: We know
about Chernobyl, and if we were to have [inaudible] where
we are today, and U.S. citizens in Ukraine, what would we
have told them? We've got the benefit of knowing everything
there is to know about Chernobyl. How far out would we [inaudible].
Would that be roughly consistent with the recommendation we
would have made then?
to some extent they may even be questioning that 50 mile evacuation
zone. Like I said, I have seen enough evidence of plume charts
and monitoring a hundred and fifty kilometers out, that indeed
the evacuation zone in my opinion, again it is just my opinion,
at least a hundred miles out. And there are soldiers and sailors
well within that area where plutonium, again, if you are just
going to check for iodine, and its very short half-life, OK,
in a device that might not be that accurate, meanwhile the plume
drifts from here to there, and the concentrations vary, like
if you were to have a campfire, and you are testing for smoke
when the fire is blowing to the north, and you are testing to
the south, of course it is going to be a lower reading, right?
And that is a lot of ways they can get around some of these
tests and samples and measurements that would have been worrisome
and quite high.
they know all about Chernobyl but they are not going to act
on it again? I refer you, and there is a link to this on "Uncovering
Plume Gate" on Plume-Gate, my WordPress blog.
can go read from the annals of the New York Sciences Academy
that particular study which is titled Consequences of the
Catastrophe for People and the Environment. It is by Alexei
Yablokov and the Nesterenko couple [Ed. Note: actually brothers].
Alexei, I don't know if I am pronouncing that right, it is an
excellent, very thorough study. The methodology and the results
are congruent with what we are finding now. It is also congruent
with that guy's bird studies.
humans and birds all suffer from radiation and while we are
two different beasts we are talking about here, to some degree
we can compare. We can compare with Chernobyl. They say "You
can't compare with Chernobyl," but that is not entirely
fact, my Mom sent me this little clip right here, you guys would
be interested to hear this. The Hiroshima bomb contained 140
pounds of uranium. Chernobyl had 360,000 pounds. Fukushima Daiichi
has 3.5 million pounds of nuclear fuel, and part of that again
is the MOX and plutonium, the most deadly substance known to
man in aerosol form, carried aloft by the Pacific jet stream.
The effects were wide-ranging. That is just a fact. The cover-up
was also wide-ranging.
told you guys, and we discussed earlier about potassium iodine.
In the documents there is plenty of indication that they take
that very seriously. They are not leaving for Japan without
their KI, period, end of story. And if you forgot it, you had
better express that to me as fast as you can and let me pick
some up from someone else that has some extra stuff when I get
there. OK, so don't let them fool you, that is a serious issue
that needs to be addressed in the states, because if we have
a meltdown, and again you look in the documents you find how
that response would actually be.
may be a Sheriff having to come out to your house, [knock-knock
sound] knock on door, say: "The nuclear plant has melted
down, you might want to know." OK, it could be that, what
is the word for it, primitive a means of establishing contact.
Maybe you don't have a phone.
you live out in the woods. Not everybody, there is a guy who
lives on the Santa Fe [Ed. Note: Penry probably means Santa
Fe college campus in Gainesville], he is naked actually,
but he does not have a phone, and he lives off the land, right?
How are you going to get ahold of, what do they call him, Ed,
I think is his name? He lives out there on the Santa Fe. He
is, what is the word, a hermit, right? How are you going to
get ahold of him? The Sheriff may actually have to come out,
so that also comes out in documentation as well.
is no quick fix, and any big one, wow, it is really severe.
They can't get in water to begin to cool it. On the 24th of
March, ladies and gentlemen, they are still discussing rewiring
circuit boards and other electronics that were inundated with
salt water. When you have a tsunami, think of the debris pushed
around, number one, and then the inundation of salt water into
the electrical components.
is no easy fix, even if you have backup diesel generators, and
even if you routinely test them, you have back-ups to those,
because the task force that went there had a recommendation
that you would want an offsite backup as well. You can have
backup generators at the nuclear power plant, but if the catastrophe
is so severe that those are damaged or there is too much radiation
on them, you can't even use them. You have to have a backup
to your back up.
with nuclear power this is par for the course for how dangerous
this is. You don't hear this kind of talk with solar panels,
do you? Really, you don't. Solar panels, the worst that can
happen is it might shatter and you get a piece of glass in your
eye, I suppose, right? A solar panel could fall on your head
and crush you at the warehouse, I guess. But comparatively speaking
you can't even compare the two.
with solar power, what is the problem there? You or I can convert
our own home into an electricity-producing plant, and sell it
back to the power companies, thereby bypassing their monopoly.
And that is why they restrict and limit solar technology and
force nuclear power on us so that we can't replicate. We would
not want to if we could, trust me, have in your back yard or
garage have a controlled nuclear criticality in heat, water,
and turn a turbine with it. It just isn't going to happen.
I was very clear about the two documents. I have got this article
on my web site, uncovering Plume-Gate, and on my Word Press
Blog, where I talk about the Navy ships, and the plumes, the
rads, the measurements, and the fact that they said we are running
worst case scenarios, in fact we got so many of them now the
guy did not want to talk about worst case any more, but they
are not going to act on it. So the whole thing for me is like
negligence. Knowing the plutonium, knowing about the MOX. You
are only checking for iodine, knowing the plume moves all around,
and you decided to just take the chance, we will leave them
there. They probably will not get sick, it will protect nuclear
now we know that our sailors are suing TEPCO. It is incredible.
It is incredible because yes, TEPCO, they are liable, but they
are to some extent going to be the scapegoat to keep the diversionary
type thing when Navy, Navy reactors, Admiral Willard, Admiral
Donald, these guys had a pretty darn good idea that we should
have been trucking our ships, our sailors and our ships to the
west. They could have have sailed them into the winds to the
Hatrick Penry would have sent them around the world. I would
have said, "Just sail them west around Cape Horn."
I suppose it is safer than getting blasted by the nuclear radiation.
know some of the female sailors at the time could have been
pregnant. So the amount of rads [permissible among certain nuclear
workers] to pregnant woman is greatly reduced. .5 [rads] is
my understanding if you work at a nuclear power plant, if you
are a woman and you are pregnant, if you are exposed at .5 rem,
that is one of their measurements, they send you home. You don't
come back while you are pregnant, that is too much.
in all these modeling, and let me read you, let me dig back
into these documents. Let me read you from some of their modeling
and some numbers that they are going to throw out there. Now
let me back up here, I want to tell you about the Jim Wiggins
quote: [Ed. Note: from page 20 of 203 of ML12052A111.pdf]
WIGGINS: "The PAR [Penry: Protective Action
Requirement, I think], looks good, and we'll let you know
about these NARAC..." [Penry: NARAC is under DOE, I believe,
and they do plume modeling. They can model fires and forest
fires, but they can also model criticalities and radiological
emanations from a meltdown. And so he says:] "We will
let you know what these NARAC, what the president's run results
in California, Hawaii and those places...
Note: from page 16 of 203 of ML12052A111.pdf]
Another reference [JIM WIGGINS]: What is
the president's case? [Penry: he says].
MALE PARTICPANT: It's, it's bounding. It
includes the fuel in the three reactors, the fuel in four
spent fuel pools. It does not include the common spent fuel
pool around Unit four, nor reactors 5 and 6 or any spent fuel
pools there. And it is assumed a release based over a four
-to five -day period --
again I told you they won't check for plutonium, and they want
to make it short. Three to five days and check iodine or cesium
or whichever one has the shortest possible half life.
we are not being treated as humans any more. We like not even
cattle, because cattle has some value to you. At this point
it is like the industry is placed on a pedestal so high, that
even the lives of children, women and children, but they would
not even tell them to stay out of rain in California. They would
not even give them any kind of advisement. In France, as far
away as France: "Don't eat any leafy green vegetables and
stay out of the rain."
have got a screen capture from a web site that shows their actual
advertisement with a woman and her child under an umbrella with
the rain falling down, and that nuclear yellow and black symbol
in the rain. Telling you, even if you don't read the Japanese
script, or French or whatever, it is right there. So you can
easily understand what the graphic is about. Stay out of the
rain, stay out of the rain.
we are directly in the Pacific jet stream, and we did not even
get that. Not even for pregnant women to stay out of the rain.
Athletes, don't practice out in the field while this aerosolized
plutonium is coming through, if you don't mind.
is a quote from the NRC FOIA documents, where the guy is talking
about modeling again. My understanding now is, and I am learning
more and more all the time, I am becoming an expert but I am
not an expert. The child-protected thyroid dose, the number
is going to read higher because the thyroid is more susceptible.
So the number may look worse, but that is because they are accounting
for [it being] more susceptible in uptake.
says: [Ed. Note: from page 64 of 195, ML13008A112.pdf]
[MR. WEBBER] "In Alaska, up to 35 FAR
rem for a one-year old-child projected thyroid dose. That
is for a northeast wind. And also up to a 6.4 in Alaska for
the thyroid dose for the one-year-old for an eastern wind.
And in Midway, if the winds are from or to the east, would
show a dose up to 4.9 rems to the thyroid for a one-year-old
he goes on to say:
are working through the interagency to understand and peer-review
the results came back, they did not look good. They have got
to review it and check it out, and I have got a lot of stuff
in there where they will beat it down. They can move a decimal
one place and wow, doesn't that make a difference folks?
here is another one where Mr. Zimmerman says: [Ed. Note: from
page 123 of 197, ML13008A113.pdf]
"Yes, and just to throw a value at you to let you know
why the concern is so high is that the Transamerica model
guy from ScottOut [Penry: That is a phonetic, the way it sounds,
not necessarily the way it is spelled], ScottOut is talking
four and a half rems is a thyroid dose for infants in California.
next screen capture shows dose equivalent to an embryo/fetus
from the U.S. NRC web site. It is .5 rem. 5 millisievert is
the maximum allowed. That is what I base my rhetoric and my
dialog when I talk to people. I am an adult male, I am older,
it does not affect me as much. I try to go with the worst of
the worst, and say, "Look, the kids were affected the most.
The thyroid study came back, pretty much, that is a lot as far
as I am concerned."
these particular ones, Sherman and Mangano, you guys Google
them and look into them, their reputation is second to none.
They are not industry scientists. They are not establishment
scientists. No one is getting rich off of this, but we are trying
to clean up the planet and restore some kind of proper living
conditions and environment. It is never going to happen with
nuclear power. It will never happen with nuclear power.
is such a concern to me, if I were president, once I had all
the plants decommissioned and shut down, and I released suppressed
technology and said we are going to use our Stan Meyer water
cars, and our Tesla devices, I would then look at China and
say, you know, to me it is like an act of war if you build any
more nuclear power plants, because all it takes is for one of
yours to go up. We are affected many, many miles away. I am
not about to lose a million Americans to you guys power plant
blowing up over there. You need to release suppressed technology
along with us. Relax your grip, you cannot have this much power
any more [or] we all die. You can still be a little more well
off and have a little more control, if that is your thing and
that is what you want. And the conditions would greatly improve.
is kind of a two-fold process. You can't just take the nuclear
power plants and shut them down. You have to offer an alternative.
Many people are totally oblivious to the fact that thousands
[of cases] here in America alone, patents are being suppressed.
my Dad is a nuclear physicist, and retired from the University
of Florida. He had a couple of proposals with the George Bush
administration and Obama administration for what I call a super
battery that would work with your solar panels on your house
storing your electricity. If is very efficient. They would call
him in and say "Can we have another press conference, Dr.
Muga? Come in..." [Penry: My real name is Tony Muga, my
father's name is Dr. Lewis [sp?] Muga from the University of
Florida]. And they would call him in and say -- and other scientists
too -- and they would have a press conference, they were looking
into alternative forms of energy, and we are looking into possibly
financing and promoting this. They would have a press conference
and promote that.
later, my Dad would get a call back saying, "Hey, we are
going to decline, we are not going to do that. We are not going
to finance your proposal."
would take the time to write out a detailed proposal. If you
knew what he had to go through to do it, Wow! I am pretty angry
for him, even if he doesn't see what I see.
then they would call him back and say, "We are not going
to look into it, but they would not have a press conference
a second time to come back and fess up and say, "Look,
we are not looking into this after all. We have no intention
of financing or funding any experimentation, exploration, R
& D into alternative technologies, alternative energy, period,
end of story."
quite ironic though that my childhood was kind of, my Dad taught
general chemistry and nuclear physics at the University of Florida
for many years. So to some extent my food and my house and my
home was paid for to some extent by nuclear power, so it is
kind of ironic that now at this point in my life I am like dedicating
myself like so many others that are standing up and doing this
to try to bring some kind of change.
have run out of time. I have got three minutes. I haven't heard
any commercials. I just hope this is all going through, folks.
And what I would say to sum up is, look, there is so much to
know. Please go to Uncovering Plume-Gate and my WordPress blog
and or to Hatrick Penry Unbound. I have got a blogtalk radio
broadcast that I do, and I have a web site. A lot of this information
I have condensed. I have brought it into easily readable and
understandable form. You can spread this amongst your friends
and family and inform people and enlighten people,
because they simply don't know.
I found out about nuclear power and the dangers of [it], Hey,
my life changed forever. It was no longer the happy go lucky,
I can fool around and play games and have a good time all the
time. I still play disc golf and I record music and play guitar,
but I am pretty much dedicated now until my last breath that
nuclear power, chemtrails, all that stuff has got to be handled,
right? It starts right here in a grass roots movement.
I thank RadChick and Jules as well for this opportunity to speak
to you guys and try to get this out there, because this information
has been suppressed, and the few that have spoken of it, I am
anxiously awaiting joining us in promoting what we now know
about Fukushima, the cover-up, the extent of the catastrophe,
the whole nine yards. I mean, I have got a whole list here.
I will publish my notes that I took from last night as an article
on my web site so that you can go back down over this, and I
will link to certain documents you can read what I am reading
for yourself in its entirety, and so you can judge for yourself,
you know, and read out of it for yourself and get out of it
for yourself what you want.
just take my opinion for it or my assessment. Go ahead and read
for yourself and form your own opinion on the matter. It is
important we do that, and we spread the word. Again, any of
this stuff you can pick up on Uncovering -- [recording abruptly
ends here]. [59:55]
Do you love our troops and sailors? Then I humbly ask your help
YouTube (5:51), Published on Jun
17, 2013 by Hatrick Penry. YouTube caption:
all started with my screen capture from the NRC FOIA documents
pertaining to Fukushima titled 'sfp #4 melt through to torus'...when
I went back the next day it had been removed from my WordPress
I attempted to re-upload the same screencap and guess what?
ERROR! Unable to upload. So I re-screencap and try to upload
again, this time I name it 'flowers and fluffy bunny rabbits'
and I am able to re-upload the pic.
that same pic has been zapped again and I'm having more difficulty
uploading screencaps from documents pertaining to our Navy Admirals
and the NRC refusing to move ships because it would cause 'angst':
the documents prove they ran a 'worst-case-scenario' but refused
to act on it.
I cannot upload ANY screencap pertaining to Navy ships and plumes.
Even when I re-screencap and rename, somehow I am being tagged.
This also includes my GoDaddy account hatrickpenryunbound.com....I
am unable to load ANY screencap having to do with the two documents
for which I am now providing my 'best of' screencaps AND a link
to the two documents...THEY ARE FREE AND OPEN TO THE PUBLIC!
am pleading with any of you who really do care and support our
troops and sailors to promote and share these two documents
and my 'best of' screencaps (all in HD, just pause and screencap
my best of if you like).
are the two most important documents I've ever read/exposed.
me offset this Chinese-style censorship. Help me protect our
troops! Share, promote and make viral!!!
Why have you not heard of this? All this information and a whole
lot more has been forwarded for OVER 2 YEARS to InfoWars, Russia
Today, and other 'alternative' media outlets. They CHOOSE not
to report on it.
FOIA document #1 ML12052A111: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1205/M...
FOIA document #2 ML13008A108: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1300/M...
I cannot stress enough...these are the two most important documents
I've ever read/exposed. There is a reason I am being censored.
Please help our sailors get justice!"
Uncovering Plume-Gate blog: http://plumegate.wordpress.com/
for BlogTalkRadio broadcast 4.8.13 children’s doses
by Hatrick Penry